From: | "John Bartlett" <johnb(at)fast(dot)fujitsu(dot)com(dot)au> |
---|---|
To: | "'Richard Troy'" <rtroy(at)ScienceTools(dot)com>, "FAST PostgreSQL" <fastpgs(at)fast(dot)fujitsu(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | "'PostgreSQL-development'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Updateable cursors |
Date: | 2007-01-24 01:17:56 |
Message-ID: | !~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAA/w1P36NVXkuUGCDGiycCfMKAAAAQAAAAD17XnZu6L0Wv0ueK+GgjJQEAAAAA@fast.fujitsu.com.au |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Richard,
Thanks for your comments.
I can see where you are coming from but I am not sure if a new log entry
would be such a good idea. The result of creating such a low level log could
be to increase the amount of logging by a rather large amount.
However, the system catalogue will contain an entry that enables a cursor to
be identified as updatable.
Regards,
John Bartlett
Software Development Engineer
Fujitsu Australia Software Technology
14 Rodborough Road, Frenchs Forest NSW 2086
Tel: +61 2 9452 9161
Fax: +61 2 9975 2899
Email: johnb(at)fast(dot)fujitsu(dot)com(dot)au
Web site: www.fastware.com
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Richard Troy
Sent: Wednesday, 24 January 2007 4:37 AM
To: FAST PostgreSQL
Cc: PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Updateable cursors
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, FAST PostgreSQL wrote:
>
> We are trying to develop the updateable cursors functionality into
> Postgresql. I have given below details of the design and also issues we
are
> facing. Looking forward to the advice on how to proceed with these
issues.
>
> Rgds,
> Arul Shaji
>
Hi Arul,
...I can see people are picking apart the implementation details so you're
getting good feedback on your ambitious proposal. Looks like you've put a
lot of thought/work into it.
I've never been a fan of cursors because they encourage bad behavior;
"Think time" in a transaction sometimes becomes "lunch time" for users and
in any event long lock duration is something to be avoided for the sake of
concurrency and sometimes performance (vacuum, etc). My philosophy is "get
in and get out quick."
Ten years ago May, our first customer insisted we implement what has
become our primary API library in Java and somewhat later I was shocked to
learn that for whatever reason Java ResultSets are supposed to be
implemented as _updateable_cursors._ This created serious security issues
for handing off results to other programs through the library - ones that
don't even have the ability to connect to the target database. Confirmed
in the behavior of Informix, we went through some hoops to remove the need
to pass ResultSets around. (If I had only known Postgres didn't implement
the RS as an updateable cursor, I'd have pushed for our primary platform
to be Postgres!)
What impresses me is that Postgres has survived so well without updateable
cursors. To my mind it illustrates that they aren't widely used. I'm
wondering what troubles lurk ahead once they're available. As a
DBA/SysAdmin, I'd be quite happy that there existed some kind of log
element that indicated updateable cursors were in use that I could search
for easily whenever trying to diagnose some performance or deadlocking
problem, etc, say log fiile entries that indicated the opening and later
closing of such a cursor with an id of some kind that allowed matching up
open/close pairs. I also think that that the documentation should be
updated to not only indicate usage of this new feature, but provide
cautionary warnings about the potential locking issues and, for the
authors of libraries, Java in particular, the possible security issues.
Regards,
Richard
--
Richard Troy, Chief Scientist
Science Tools Corporation
510-924-1363 or 202-747-1263
rtroy(at)ScienceTools(dot)com, http://ScienceTools.com/
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
This is an email from Fujitsu Australia Software Technology Pty Ltd, ABN 27 003 693 481. It is confidential to the ordinary user of the email address to which it was addressed and may contain copyright and/or legally privileged information. No one else may read, print, store, copy or forward all or any of it or its attachments. If you receive this email in error, please return to sender. Thank you.
If you do not wish to receive commercial email messages from Fujitsu Australia Software Technology Pty Ltd, please email unsubscribe(at)fast(dot)fujitsu(dot)com(dot)au
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-24 01:31:54 | Re: tripping an assert in 8.1.6 (more info) |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-01-23 23:20:40 | Re: About PostgreSQL certification |