| From: | <kpi6288(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | AW: Use left hand column for null values |
| Date: | 2018-01-19 17:01:51 |
| Message-ID: | !&!LgAAAAAAAADgysc3T9VPRqt6Rzq5kSxhAQDDto4Q93URzrTNAKoAu7bmAAAAAAAOAABGAAAAAAAAAODKxzdP1U9Gq3pHOrmRLGEHAMO2jhD3dRHOtM0AqgC7tuYAAAAAAA4AANlTnCJhprtFudq2LHCBs8EBAEcXAAAAAAAAAAAEAAAAuQAAACkAAABBVzogVXNlIGxlZnQgaGFuZCBjb2x1bW4gZm9yIG51bGwgdmFsdWVzAA==@gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
> [David G. Johnston]
> My $0.02
>
> Unless you have some need to generalize I'd say just brute-force it and be done.
>
> You could maybe play with arrays to get something that looks different but I don't think it would be much shorter to code or easier to understand.
My concern was performance, because I feared that coalesce would evaluate e.g. column c1 50 times. But I did some testing and it seems to scale linear. 100,000 rows with 50 columns take 25 seconds on my test machine. Not exciting but something I can work with.
I played already with arrays but what I came up with was slower than the plain coalesce.
Klaus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-01-19 17:15:13 | Re: Query optimization with repeated calculations |
| Previous Message | Robert McGehee | 2018-01-19 16:03:48 | Query optimization with repeated calculations |