Re: Elimination of the repetitive code at the SLRU bootstrap functions.

From: Evgeny Voropaev <evgeny(dot)voropaev(at)tantorlabs(dot)com>
To: aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org
Subject: Re: Elimination of the repetitive code at the SLRU bootstrap functions.
Date: 2025-02-14 06:54:06
Message-ID: fd98bc50-7488-414b-9e98-cb786132e114@tantorlabs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello Aleksander!
Hello Álvaro!
Thank you for your attention to the patch.

> Since BootStrapSlruPage() is the only caller of ZeroPage() it seems to
> me that it merely wastes space in SlruCtlData. On top of that I'm not
> 100% sure if all the supported platforms have C99 compilers with
> designated initializers support.

> Wouldn't it be simpler to pass the callback straight to
> BootStrapSlruPage()?

I agree with your proposals. Moreover, similar solution is also implemented and exploited at
Tantor's versions of the xid64 patch (https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/5ca56aed-dc69-4c3e-968f-a822ae0937b5%40gmail.com)

The corrected patch version implementing these proposals is attached.

Best regards,
Evgeny Voropaev,
Tantor Labs LLC.

Attachment Content-Type Size
v2-0001-Elimination-of-the-repetitive-code-at-the-SLRU-bo.patch text/x-patch 9.6 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2025-02-14 07:18:42 Re: Proposal: Filter irrelevant change before reassemble transactions during logical decoding
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2025-02-14 06:24:22 Re: Move wal_buffers_full to WalUsage (and report it in pgss/explain)