Re: describe special values in GUC descriptions more consistently

From: Ilia Evdokimov <ilya(dot)evdokimov(at)tantorlabs(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: describe special values in GUC descriptions more consistently
Date: 2025-02-17 09:50:00
Message-ID: e82d4647-ce7f-45c7-9b01-fb900a050767@tantorlabs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 14.02.2025 19:47, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 05:01:59PM -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote:
>> Okay, I took your suggestions in v7.
> Committed. Thanks, David, Peter, and Daniel!
>

Hi,

Maybe I'm being picky, but in auto_explain, the parameters
log_min_duration and log_parameter_max_length do not follow the
conventions we have adopted. I mean we should use numerals instead of
words. I'm attaching a patch to fix this.

--
Best regards,
Ilia Evdokimov,
Tantor Labs LLC.

Attachment Content-Type Size
v8-0001-Standardize-parameter-descriptions-in-auto_explain.patch text/x-patch 1.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amul Sul 2025-02-17 10:11:20 Re: NOT ENFORCED constraint feature
Previous Message Pavel Borisov 2025-02-17 09:44:25 Re: Get rid of WALBufMappingLock