| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [patch] CLUSTER blocks scanned progress reporting |
| Date: | 2020-11-27 11:21:12 |
| Message-ID: | e363cdc6-68b6-1ca8-1351-9ef155f9e84a@oss.nttdata.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020/11/27 1:51, Fujii Masao wrote:
>
>
> On 2020/11/27 1:45, Matthias van de Meent wrote:
>> On Thu, 26 Nov 2020 at 00:55, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote:
>>>
>>> + * A heap scan need not return tuples for the last page it has
>>> + * scanned. To ensure that heap_blks_scanned is equivalent to
>>> + * total_heap_blks after the table scan phase, this parameter
>>> + * is manually updated to the correct value when the table scan
>>> + * finishes.
>>>
>>> So it's better to update this comment a bit? For example,
>>>
>>> If the scanned last pages are empty, it's possible to go to the next phase
>>> while heap_blks_scanned != heap_blks_total. To ensure that they are
>>> equivalet after the table scan phase, this parameter is manually updated
>>> to the correct value when the table scan finishes.
>>>
>>
>> PFA a patch with updated message and comment. I've reworded the
>> messages to specifically mention empty pages and the need for setting
>> heap_blks_scanned = total_heap_blks explicitly.
>
> Thanks for updating the patch! It looks good to me.
> Barring any objection, I will commit this patch (also back-patch to v12).
Pushed. Thanks!
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2020-11-27 12:05:00 | Re: A problem about partitionwise join |
| Previous Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2020-11-27 10:40:27 | Printing LSN made easy |