Re: pg_rewind vs superuser

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_rewind vs superuser
Date: 2019-04-08 08:03:48
Message-ID: e1570ba6-4459-d9b2-1321-9449adaaef4c@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-04-04 12:43, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I would like to apply this down to 9.5 for the checkpoint part and
> down to 11 for the role part, so if anybody has any comments, please
> feel free.

How about some tests to show that this is actually true?

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2019-04-08 08:07:28 Re: [HACKERS] Weaker shmem interlock w/o postmaster.pid
Previous Message Yuzuko Hosoya 2019-04-08 07:57:35 RE: Problem with default partition pruning