| From: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [WIP]Vertical Clustered Index (columnar store extension) |
| Date: | 2017-03-04 13:40:03 |
| Message-ID: | dd403262-7076-3ee7-442e-f1e8e8dd198b@pgmasters.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/4/17 8:33 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 3/3/17 16:16, David Steele wrote:
>> While this looks like it could be a really significant performance
>> improvement, I think the above demonstrates that it needs a lot of work.
>> I know this is not new to the 2017-03 CF but it doesn't seem enough
>> progress has been made since posting to allow it to be committed in time
>> for v10.
>>
>> I recommend moving this patch to the 2017-07 CF.
>
> I think the patch that was in 2017-01 was given some feedback that put
> the fundamental approach in question, which the author appeared to agree
> with. So I don't know why this patch appeared in this CF at all.
Then it sounds like it should be marked RWF. Haribabu can resubmit when
there's a new candidate patch.
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Julian Markwort | 2017-03-04 13:41:52 | Re: [FEATURE PATCH] pg_stat_statements with plans |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-03-04 13:33:48 | Re: [WIP]Vertical Clustered Index (columnar store extension) |