From: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: non-bulk inserts and tuple routing |
Date: | 2018-02-19 04:19:10 |
Message-ID: | c3b19f9d-dfc0-12b0-7bd3-cb38aa86d4f5@lab.ntt.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Fujita-san,
On 2018/02/16 19:50, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> (2018/02/16 18:23), Amit Langote wrote:
>> Good idea. Done.
> Thanks. I fixed a typo (s/Converti/Convert/) and adjusted these comments
> a bit further to match the preceding code/comments. Attached is the
> updated version.
Thank you for updating the patch.
>> Updated patch attached.
>
> Thanks, I think the patch is in good shape, so I'll mark this as ready for
> committer.
Thanks a lot for reviewing!
Attached rebased patch.
Regards,
Amit
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v11-0001-During-tuple-routing-initialize-per-partition-ob.patch | text/plain | 22.7 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2018-02-19 04:26:35 | Re: [HACKERS] why not parallel seq scan for slow functions |
Previous Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2018-02-19 04:05:54 | Re: [HACKERS] why not parallel seq scan for slow functions |