From d12280d05fdebd2f35478badc4ce2ea804be8ffe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alvaro Herrera Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 18:27:30 -0300 Subject: [PATCH 05/24] relcache: don't consider nonzero pg_class.relam as an index Right now, only indexes have the "relam" field set to a value different from zero. Once we introduce other kinds of access methods, that's no longer the case. In the one test that currently only checks for relam, add a test for relkind also. (Without this, creating a different kind of relation with nonzero relam causes weird failures that the pg_index row cannot be found). --- src/backend/utils/cache/relcache.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/utils/cache/relcache.c b/src/backend/utils/cache/relcache.c index 44e9509..5ca4e2f6 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/cache/relcache.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/cache/relcache.c @@ -1051,7 +1051,8 @@ RelationBuildDesc(Oid targetRelId, bool insertIt) /* * if it's an index, initialize index-related information */ - if (OidIsValid(relation->rd_rel->relam)) + if (relation->rd_rel->relkind == RELKIND_INDEX && + OidIsValid(relation->rd_rel->relam)) RelationInitIndexAccessInfo(relation); /* extract reloptions if any */ -- 2.1.4