From 8d864515da68728ddee10d455f8bdb64d34277aa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Andrey V. Lepikhov" Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 15:17:53 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] Remove self-joins. A Self Join Removal (SJR) feature removes inner join of plane table to itself in a query plan if can be proved that the join can be replaced with a scan. The proof based on innerrel_is_unique machinery. We can remove a self-join when for each outer row: 1. At most one inner row matches the join clauses. 2. If the join target list contains any inner vars, an inner row must be (physically) the same row as the outer one. In this patch we use Rowley's [1] approach to identify a self-join: 1. Collect all mergejoinable join quals which look like a.x = b.x 2. Check innerrel_is_unique() for the qual list from (1). If it returns true, then outer row matches only the same row from the inner relation. 3. If uniqueness of outer relation deduces from baserestrictinfo clause like 'x=const' on unique field(s), check that inner has the same clause with the same constant(s). 4. Compare RowMarks of inner and outer relations. They must have the same strength. Some regression tests changed due to self-join removal logic. [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/raw/CAApHDvpggnFMC4yP-jUO7PKN%3DfXeErW5bOxisvJ0HvkHQEY%3DWw%40mail.gmail.com --- doc/src/sgml/config.sgml | 16 + src/backend/optimizer/path/indxpath.c | 39 + src/backend/optimizer/plan/analyzejoins.c | 1045 ++++++++++++++++++++- src/backend/optimizer/plan/planmain.c | 5 + src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c | 10 + src/include/optimizer/paths.h | 3 + src/include/optimizer/planmain.h | 6 + src/test/regress/expected/equivclass.out | 32 + src/test/regress/expected/join.out | 735 +++++++++++++++ src/test/regress/expected/sysviews.out | 3 +- src/test/regress/sql/equivclass.sql | 16 + src/test/regress/sql/join.sql | 329 +++++++ src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list | 2 + 13 files changed, 2215 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml index a5cd4e44c7..2cfb62f97f 100644 --- a/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml +++ b/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml @@ -5297,6 +5297,22 @@ ANY num_sync ( + enable_self_join_removal (boolean) + + enable_self_join_removal configuration parameter + + + + + Enables or disables the query planner's optimization which analyses + query tree and replaces self joins with semantically equivalent single + scans. Take into consideration only plain tables. + The default is on. + + + + enable_seqscan (boolean) diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/path/indxpath.c b/src/backend/optimizer/path/indxpath.c index 045ff2e487..a9f8f89312 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/path/indxpath.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/path/indxpath.c @@ -3495,8 +3495,24 @@ bool relation_has_unique_index_for(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel, List *restrictlist, List *exprlist, List *oprlist) +{ + return relation_has_unique_index_ext(root, rel, restrictlist, + exprlist, oprlist, NULL); +} + +/* + * relation_has_unique_index_ext + * if extra_clauses isn't NULL, return baserestrictinfo clauses which were + * used to derive uniqueness. + */ +bool +relation_has_unique_index_ext(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel, + List *restrictlist, + List *exprlist, List *oprlist, + List **extra_clauses) { ListCell *ic; + List *exprs; Assert(list_length(exprlist) == list_length(oprlist)); @@ -3551,6 +3567,8 @@ relation_has_unique_index_for(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel, IndexOptInfo *ind = (IndexOptInfo *) lfirst(ic); int c; + exprs = NIL; + /* * If the index is not unique, or not immediately enforced, or if it's * a partial index that doesn't match the query, it's useless here. @@ -3598,6 +3616,23 @@ relation_has_unique_index_for(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel, if (match_index_to_operand(rexpr, c, ind)) { matched = true; /* column is unique */ + + if (bms_membership(rinfo->clause_relids) == BMS_SINGLETON) + { + MemoryContext oldMemCtx = + MemoryContextSwitchTo(root->planner_cxt); + + /* + * Add filter clause into a list allowing caller to + * know if uniquiness have made not only by join + * clauses. + */ + Assert(bms_is_empty(rinfo->left_relids) || + bms_is_empty(rinfo->right_relids)); + exprs = lappend(exprs, rinfo); + MemoryContextSwitchTo(oldMemCtx); + } + break; } } @@ -3640,7 +3675,11 @@ relation_has_unique_index_for(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel, /* Matched all key columns of this index? */ if (c == ind->nkeycolumns) + { + if (extra_clauses) + *extra_clauses = exprs; return true; + } } return false; diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/plan/analyzejoins.c b/src/backend/optimizer/plan/analyzejoins.c index bbeca9a9ab..c7d30ba8ca 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/plan/analyzejoins.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/plan/analyzejoins.c @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ */ #include "postgres.h" +#include "catalog/pg_class.h" #include "nodes/nodeFuncs.h" #include "optimizer/clauses.h" #include "optimizer/joininfo.h" @@ -32,21 +33,40 @@ #include "optimizer/tlist.h" #include "utils/lsyscache.h" +/* + * UniqueRelInfo caches a fact that a relation is unique when being joined + * to other relation(s) specified by outerrelids. + * extra_clauses contains additional clauses from a baserestrictinfo list that + * were used to prove uniqueness. We cache it for SJ checking procedure: SJ can + * be removed if outer relation contains strictly the same set of clauses. + */ +typedef struct UniqueRelInfo +{ + Relids outerrelids; + List *extra_clauses; +} UniqueRelInfo; + +bool enable_self_join_removal; + /* local functions */ static bool join_is_removable(PlannerInfo *root, SpecialJoinInfo *sjinfo); static void remove_rel_from_query(PlannerInfo *root, int relid, - Relids joinrelids); + Relids joinrelids, int subst_relid); static List *remove_rel_from_joinlist(List *joinlist, int relid, int *nremoved); static bool rel_supports_distinctness(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel); static bool rel_is_distinct_for(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel, - List *clause_list); + List *clause_list, List **extra_clauses); static Oid distinct_col_search(int colno, List *colnos, List *opids); static bool is_innerrel_unique_for(PlannerInfo *root, Relids joinrelids, Relids outerrelids, RelOptInfo *innerrel, JoinType jointype, - List *restrictlist); + List *restrictlist, + List **extra_clauses); +static void change_rinfo(RestrictInfo *rinfo, Index from, Index to); +static Bitmapset *change_relid(Relids relids, Index oldId, Index newId); +static void change_varno(Expr *expr, Index oldRelid, Index newRelid); /* @@ -86,7 +106,7 @@ restart: remove_rel_from_query(root, innerrelid, bms_union(sjinfo->min_lefthand, - sjinfo->min_righthand)); + sjinfo->min_righthand), 0); /* We verify that exactly one reference gets removed from joinlist */ nremoved = 0; @@ -287,7 +307,7 @@ join_is_removable(PlannerInfo *root, SpecialJoinInfo *sjinfo) * Now that we have the relevant equality join clauses, try to prove the * innerrel distinct. */ - if (rel_is_distinct_for(root, innerrel, clause_list)) + if (rel_is_distinct_for(root, innerrel, clause_list, NULL)) return true; /* @@ -300,7 +320,10 @@ join_is_removable(PlannerInfo *root, SpecialJoinInfo *sjinfo) /* * Remove the target relid from the planner's data structures, having - * determined that there is no need to include it in the query. + * determined that there is no need to include it in the query. Or replace + * with another relid. + * To reusability, this routine can work in two modes: delete relid from a plan + * or replace it. It is used in replace mode in a self-join removing process. * * We are not terribly thorough here. We must make sure that the rel is * no longer treated as a baserel, and that attributes of other baserels @@ -309,13 +332,16 @@ join_is_removable(PlannerInfo *root, SpecialJoinInfo *sjinfo) * lists, but only if they belong to the outer join identified by joinrelids. */ static void -remove_rel_from_query(PlannerInfo *root, int relid, Relids joinrelids) +remove_rel_from_query(PlannerInfo *root, int relid, Relids joinrelids, + int subst_relid) { RelOptInfo *rel = find_base_rel(root, relid); List *joininfos; Index rti; ListCell *l; + Assert(subst_relid == 0 || relid != subst_relid); + /* * Mark the rel as "dead" to show it is no longer part of the join tree. * (Removing it from the baserel array altogether seems too risky.) @@ -345,8 +371,11 @@ remove_rel_from_query(PlannerInfo *root, int relid, Relids joinrelids) attroff--) { otherrel->attr_needed[attroff] = - bms_del_member(otherrel->attr_needed[attroff], relid); + change_relid(otherrel->attr_needed[attroff], relid, subst_relid); } + + /* Update lateral references. */ + change_varno((Expr *) otherrel->lateral_vars, relid, subst_relid); } /* @@ -361,10 +390,12 @@ remove_rel_from_query(PlannerInfo *root, int relid, Relids joinrelids) { SpecialJoinInfo *sjinfo = (SpecialJoinInfo *) lfirst(l); - sjinfo->min_lefthand = bms_del_member(sjinfo->min_lefthand, relid); - sjinfo->min_righthand = bms_del_member(sjinfo->min_righthand, relid); - sjinfo->syn_lefthand = bms_del_member(sjinfo->syn_lefthand, relid); - sjinfo->syn_righthand = bms_del_member(sjinfo->syn_righthand, relid); + sjinfo->min_lefthand = change_relid(sjinfo->min_lefthand, relid, subst_relid); + sjinfo->min_righthand = change_relid(sjinfo->min_righthand, relid, subst_relid); + sjinfo->syn_lefthand = change_relid(sjinfo->syn_lefthand, relid, subst_relid); + sjinfo->syn_righthand = change_relid(sjinfo->syn_righthand, relid, subst_relid); + + change_varno((Expr *) sjinfo->semi_rhs_exprs, relid, subst_relid); } /* @@ -385,8 +416,7 @@ remove_rel_from_query(PlannerInfo *root, int relid, Relids joinrelids) { PlaceHolderInfo *phinfo = (PlaceHolderInfo *) lfirst(l); - Assert(!bms_is_member(relid, phinfo->ph_lateral)); - if (bms_is_subset(phinfo->ph_needed, joinrelids) && + if (subst_relid == 0 && bms_is_subset(phinfo->ph_needed, joinrelids) && bms_is_member(relid, phinfo->ph_eval_at)) { root->placeholder_list = foreach_delete_current(root->placeholder_list, @@ -395,9 +425,23 @@ remove_rel_from_query(PlannerInfo *root, int relid, Relids joinrelids) } else { - phinfo->ph_eval_at = bms_del_member(phinfo->ph_eval_at, relid); + phinfo->ph_eval_at = change_relid(phinfo->ph_eval_at, relid, subst_relid); Assert(!bms_is_empty(phinfo->ph_eval_at)); - phinfo->ph_needed = bms_del_member(phinfo->ph_needed, relid); + phinfo->ph_needed = change_relid(phinfo->ph_needed, relid, subst_relid); + Assert(subst_relid != 0 || !bms_is_member(relid, phinfo->ph_lateral)); + phinfo->ph_lateral = change_relid(phinfo->ph_lateral, relid, subst_relid); + phinfo->ph_var->phrels = change_relid(phinfo->ph_var->phrels, relid, subst_relid); + } + } + + if (subst_relid != 0) + { + foreach(l, rel->baserestrictinfo) + { + RestrictInfo *rinfo = (RestrictInfo *) lfirst(l); + + change_rinfo(rinfo, relid, subst_relid); + distribute_restrictinfo_to_rels(root, rinfo); } } @@ -422,6 +466,12 @@ remove_rel_from_query(PlannerInfo *root, int relid, Relids joinrelids) remove_join_clause_from_rels(root, rinfo, rinfo->required_relids); + /* + * replace relid with relid of keeping relation. After that, this + * restriction can be attached to keeping relation. + */ + change_rinfo(rinfo, relid, subst_relid); + if (RINFO_IS_PUSHED_DOWN(rinfo, joinrelids)) { /* Recheck that qual doesn't actually reference the target rel */ @@ -436,6 +486,8 @@ remove_rel_from_query(PlannerInfo *root, int relid, Relids joinrelids) relid); distribute_restrictinfo_to_rels(root, rinfo); } + else if (subst_relid != 0) + distribute_restrictinfo_to_rels(root, rinfo); } /* @@ -639,9 +691,14 @@ rel_supports_distinctness(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel) * Note that the passed-in clause_list may be destructively modified! This * is OK for current uses, because the clause_list is built by the caller for * the sole purpose of passing to this function. + * + * outer_exprs contains right sides of baserestrictinfo clauses looks like + * x = const if distinctness is derived from such clauses, not joininfo clause. + * Pass NULL for the param value, if it is not interested. */ static bool -rel_is_distinct_for(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel, List *clause_list) +rel_is_distinct_for(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel, List *clause_list, + List **extra_clauses) { /* * We could skip a couple of tests here if we assume all callers checked @@ -654,10 +711,11 @@ rel_is_distinct_for(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel, List *clause_list) { /* * Examine the indexes to see if we have a matching unique index. - * relation_has_unique_index_for automatically adds any usable + * relation_has_unique_index_ext automatically adds any usable * restriction clauses for the rel, so we needn't do that here. */ - if (relation_has_unique_index_for(root, rel, clause_list, NIL, NIL)) + if (relation_has_unique_index_ext(root, rel, clause_list, NIL, NIL, + extra_clauses)) return true; } else if (rel->rtekind == RTE_SUBQUERY) @@ -971,9 +1029,21 @@ innerrel_is_unique(PlannerInfo *root, JoinType jointype, List *restrictlist, bool force_cache) +{ + return innerrel_is_unique_ext(root, joinrelids, outerrelids, innerrel, + jointype, restrictlist, force_cache, NULL); +} + +bool +innerrel_is_unique_ext(PlannerInfo *root, Relids joinrelids, Relids outerrelids, + RelOptInfo *innerrel, JoinType jointype, + List *restrictlist, bool force_cache, + List **extra_clauses) { MemoryContext old_context; ListCell *lc; + UniqueRelInfo *uniqueRelInfo; + List *outer_exprs = NIL; /* Certainly can't prove uniqueness when there are no joinclauses */ if (restrictlist == NIL) @@ -995,10 +1065,14 @@ innerrel_is_unique(PlannerInfo *root, */ foreach(lc, innerrel->unique_for_rels) { - Relids unique_for_rels = (Relids) lfirst(lc); + uniqueRelInfo = (UniqueRelInfo *) lfirst(lc); - if (bms_is_subset(unique_for_rels, outerrelids)) + if (bms_is_subset(uniqueRelInfo->outerrelids, outerrelids)) + { + if (extra_clauses) + *extra_clauses = uniqueRelInfo->extra_clauses; return true; /* Success! */ + } } /* @@ -1015,7 +1089,7 @@ innerrel_is_unique(PlannerInfo *root, /* No cached information, so try to make the proof. */ if (is_innerrel_unique_for(root, joinrelids, outerrelids, innerrel, - jointype, restrictlist)) + jointype, restrictlist, &outer_exprs)) { /* * Cache the positive result for future probes, being sure to keep it @@ -1028,10 +1102,15 @@ innerrel_is_unique(PlannerInfo *root, * supersets of them anyway. */ old_context = MemoryContextSwitchTo(root->planner_cxt); + uniqueRelInfo = palloc(sizeof(UniqueRelInfo)); + uniqueRelInfo->extra_clauses = outer_exprs; + uniqueRelInfo->outerrelids = bms_copy(outerrelids); innerrel->unique_for_rels = lappend(innerrel->unique_for_rels, - bms_copy(outerrelids)); + uniqueRelInfo); MemoryContextSwitchTo(old_context); + if (extra_clauses) + *extra_clauses = outer_exprs; return true; /* Success! */ } else @@ -1077,7 +1156,8 @@ is_innerrel_unique_for(PlannerInfo *root, Relids outerrelids, RelOptInfo *innerrel, JoinType jointype, - List *restrictlist) + List *restrictlist, + List **extra_clauses) { List *clause_list = NIL; ListCell *lc; @@ -1119,5 +1199,920 @@ is_innerrel_unique_for(PlannerInfo *root, } /* Let rel_is_distinct_for() do the hard work */ - return rel_is_distinct_for(root, innerrel, clause_list); + return rel_is_distinct_for(root, innerrel, clause_list, extra_clauses); +} + +typedef struct ChangeVarnoContext +{ + Index oldRelid; + Index newRelid; +} ChangeVarnoContext; + + +static bool +change_varno_walker(Node *node, ChangeVarnoContext *context) +{ + if (node == NULL) + return false; + + if (IsA(node, Var)) + { + Var *var = (Var *) node; + + if (var->varno == context->oldRelid) + { + var->varno = context->newRelid; + var->varnosyn = context->newRelid; + var->location = -1; + } + else if (var->varno == context->newRelid) + var->location = -1; + + return false; + } + if (IsA(node, RestrictInfo)) + { + change_rinfo((RestrictInfo *) node, context->oldRelid, context->newRelid); + return false; + } + return expression_tree_walker(node, change_varno_walker, context); +} + +/* + * For all Vars in the expression that have varno = oldRelid, set + * varno = newRelid. + */ +static void +change_varno(Expr *expr, Index oldRelid, Index newRelid) +{ + ChangeVarnoContext context; + + if (newRelid == 0) + return; + + context.oldRelid = oldRelid; + context.newRelid = newRelid; + change_varno_walker((Node *) expr, &context); +} + +/* + * Substitute newId for oldId in relids. + */ +static Bitmapset * +change_relid(Relids relids, Index oldId, Index newId) +{ + if (newId == 0) + /* Delete relid without substitution. */ + return bms_del_member(relids, oldId); + + if (bms_is_member(oldId, relids)) + return bms_add_member(bms_del_member(bms_copy(relids), oldId), newId); + + return relids; +} + +static void +change_rinfo(RestrictInfo *rinfo, Index from, Index to) +{ + bool is_req_equal; + + if (to == 0) + return; + + is_req_equal = (rinfo->required_relids == rinfo->clause_relids); + + change_varno(rinfo->clause, from, to); + change_varno(rinfo->orclause, from, to); + rinfo->clause_relids = change_relid(rinfo->clause_relids, from, to); + if (is_req_equal) + rinfo->required_relids = rinfo->clause_relids; + else + rinfo->required_relids = change_relid(rinfo->required_relids, from, to); + rinfo->left_relids = change_relid(rinfo->left_relids, from, to); + rinfo->right_relids = change_relid(rinfo->right_relids, from, to); + rinfo->outer_relids = change_relid(rinfo->outer_relids, from, to); + rinfo->nullable_relids = change_relid(rinfo->nullable_relids, from, to); +} + +/* + * Update EC members to point to the remaining relation instead of the removed + * one, removing duplicates. + */ +static void +update_ec_members(EquivalenceClass *ec, Index toRemove, Index toKeep) +{ + int counter; + + for (counter = 0; counter < list_length(ec->ec_members);) + { + ListCell *cell = list_nth_cell(ec->ec_members, counter); + EquivalenceMember *em = lfirst(cell); + int counter1; + + if (!bms_is_member(toRemove, em->em_relids)) + { + counter++; + continue; + } + + em->em_relids = change_relid(em->em_relids, toRemove, toKeep); + /* We only process inner joins */ + change_varno(em->em_expr, toRemove, toKeep); + + /* + * After we switched the equivalence member to the remaining relation, + * check that it is not the same as the existing member, and if it is, + * delete it. + */ + for (counter1 = 0; counter1 < list_length(ec->ec_members); counter1++) + { + EquivalenceMember *other; + + if (counter1 == counter) + continue; + + other = castNode(EquivalenceMember, list_nth(ec->ec_members, counter1)); + + if (equal(other->em_expr, em->em_expr)) + break; + } + + if (counter1 < list_length(ec->ec_members)) + ec->ec_members = list_delete_cell(ec->ec_members, cell); + else + counter++; + } +} + +/* + * Update EC sources to point to the remaining relation instead of the + * removed one. + */ +static void +update_ec_sources(List **sources, Index toRemove, Index toKeep) +{ + int counter; + + for (counter = 0; counter < list_length(*sources);) + { + ListCell *cell = list_nth_cell(*sources, counter); + RestrictInfo *rinfo = castNode(RestrictInfo, lfirst(cell)); + int counter1; + + if (!bms_is_member(toRemove, rinfo->required_relids)) + { + counter++; + continue; + } + + change_varno(rinfo->clause, toRemove, toKeep); + + /* + * After switching the clause to the remaining relation, check it for + * redundancy with existing ones. We don't have to check for + * redundancy with derived clauses, because we've just deleted them. + */ + for (counter1 = 0; counter1 < list_length(*sources); counter1++) + { + RestrictInfo *other; + + if (counter1 == counter) + continue; + + other = castNode(RestrictInfo, list_nth(*sources, counter1)); + if (equal(rinfo->clause, other->clause)) + break; + } + + if (counter1 < list_length(*sources)) + *sources = list_delete_cell(*sources, cell); + else + { + counter++; + + /* We will keep this RestrictInfo, correct its relids. */ + change_rinfo(rinfo, toRemove, toKeep); + } + } +} + +/* + * Remove a relation after we have proven that it participates only in an + * unneeded unique self join. + * + * The joinclauses list is destructively changed. + */ +static void +remove_self_join_rel(PlannerInfo *root, PlanRowMark *kmark, PlanRowMark *rmark, + RelOptInfo *toKeep, RelOptInfo *toRemove) +{ + ListCell *cell; + int i; + List *target = NIL; + + /* + * Include all eclass mentions of removed relation into the eclass + * mentions of kept relation. + */ + toKeep->eclass_indexes = bms_add_members(toRemove->eclass_indexes, + toKeep->eclass_indexes); + + /* + * Now, baserestrictinfo replenished with restrictions from removing + * relation. It is needed to remove duplicates and replace degenerated + * clauses with a NullTest. + */ + foreach(cell, toKeep->baserestrictinfo) + { + RestrictInfo *rinfo = lfirst_node(RestrictInfo, cell); + ListCell *otherCell = NULL; + + Assert(!bms_is_member(toRemove->relid, rinfo->clause_relids)); + + /* + * If this clause is a mergejoinable equality clause that compares a + * variable to itself, i.e., has the form of "X=X", replace it with + * null test. + */ + if (rinfo->mergeopfamilies && IsA(rinfo->clause, OpExpr)) + { + Expr *leftOp; + Expr *rightOp; + + leftOp = (Expr *) get_leftop(rinfo->clause); + rightOp = (Expr *) get_rightop(rinfo->clause); + + if (leftOp != NULL && equal(leftOp, rightOp)) + { + NullTest *nullTest = makeNode(NullTest); + + nullTest->arg = leftOp; + nullTest->nulltesttype = IS_NOT_NULL; + nullTest->argisrow = false; + nullTest->location = -1; + rinfo->clause = (Expr *) nullTest; + } + } + + /* Search for duplicates. */ + foreach(otherCell, target) + { + RestrictInfo *other = lfirst_node(RestrictInfo, otherCell); + + if (other == rinfo || + (rinfo->parent_ec != NULL + && other->parent_ec == rinfo->parent_ec) + || equal(rinfo->clause, other->clause)) + { + break; + } + } + + if (otherCell != NULL) + /* Duplicate found */ + continue; + + target = lappend(target, rinfo); + } + + list_free(toKeep->baserestrictinfo); + toKeep->baserestrictinfo = target; + + /* + * Update the equivalence classes that reference the removed relations. + */ + foreach(cell, root->eq_classes) + { + EquivalenceClass *ec = lfirst(cell); + + if (!bms_is_member(toRemove->relid, ec->ec_relids)) + { + /* + * This EC doesn't reference the removed relation, nothing to be + * done for it. + */ + continue; + } + + /* + * Update the EC members to reference the remaining relation instead + * of the removed one. + */ + update_ec_members(ec, toRemove->relid, toKeep->relid); + ec->ec_relids = change_relid(ec->ec_relids, toRemove->relid, toKeep->relid); + + /* + * We will now update source and derived clauses of the EC. + * + * Restriction clauses for base relations are already distributed to + * the respective baserestrictinfo lists (see + * generate_implied_equalities). The above code has already processed + * this list, and updated these clauses to reference the remaining + * relation, so we can skip them here based on their relids. + * + * Likewise, we have already processed the join clauses that join the + * removed relation to the remaining one. + * + * Finally, there are join clauses that join the removed relation to + * some third relation. We can't just delete the source clauses and + * regenerate them from the EC, because the corresponding equality + * operators might be missing (see the handling of ec_broken). + * Therefore, we will update the references in the source clauses. + * + * Derived clauses can be generated again, so it is simpler to just + * delete them. + */ + list_free(ec->ec_derives); + ec->ec_derives = NULL; + update_ec_sources(&ec->ec_sources, toRemove->relid, toKeep->relid); + } + + /* + * Transfer the targetlist and attr_needed flags. + */ + Assert(toRemove->reltarget->sortgrouprefs == 0); + + foreach(cell, toRemove->reltarget->exprs) + { + Expr *node = lfirst(cell); + + change_varno(node, toRemove->relid, toKeep->relid); + if (!list_member(toKeep->reltarget->exprs, node)) + toKeep->reltarget->exprs = lappend(toKeep->reltarget->exprs, node); + } + + for (i = toKeep->min_attr; i <= toKeep->max_attr; i++) + { + int attno = i - toKeep->min_attr; + + toKeep->attr_needed[attno] = bms_add_members(toKeep->attr_needed[attno], + toRemove->attr_needed[attno]); + } + + /* + * If the removed relation has a row mark, transfer it to the remaining + * one. + * + * If both rels have row marks, just keep the one corresponding to the + * remaining relation, because we verified earlier that they have the same + * strength. + * + * Also make sure that the scratch->row_marks cache is up to date, because + * we are going to use it for further join removals. + */ + if (rmark) + { + if (kmark) + { + Assert(kmark->markType == rmark->markType); + + /* + * XXX: Why here we haven't any differences in removing rmark or + * kmark? + */ + root->rowMarks = list_delete_ptr(root->rowMarks, rmark); + } + else + { + /* Shouldn't have inheritance children here. */ + Assert(rmark->rti == rmark->prti); + + rmark->rti = rmark->prti = toKeep->relid; + } + } + + /* + * Change varno in some special cases with non-trivial RangeTblEntry + */ + foreach(cell, root->parse->rtable) + { + RangeTblEntry *rte = lfirst(cell); + + switch (rte->rtekind) + { + case RTE_FUNCTION: + change_varno((Expr *) rte->functions, toRemove->relid, toKeep->relid); + break; + case RTE_TABLEFUNC: + change_varno((Expr *) rte->tablefunc, toRemove->relid, toKeep->relid); + break; + case RTE_VALUES: + change_varno((Expr *) rte->values_lists, toRemove->relid, toKeep->relid); + break; + default: + /* no op */ + break; + } + } + + /* + * Replace varno in root targetlist and HAVING clause. + */ + change_varno((Expr *) root->processed_tlist, toRemove->relid, toKeep->relid); + change_varno((Expr *) root->parse->havingQual, toRemove->relid, toKeep->relid); + + /* + * Transfer join and restriction clauses from the removed relation to the + * remaining one. We change the Vars of the clause to point to the + * remaining relation instead of the removed one. The clauses that require + * a subset of joinrelids become restriction clauses of the remaining + * relation, and others remain join clauses. We append them to + * baserestrictinfo and joininfo respectively, trying not to introduce + * duplicates. + * + * We also have to process the 'joinclauses' list here, because it + * contains EC-derived join clauses which must become filter clauses. It + * is not enough to just correct the ECs, because the EC-derived + * restrictions are generated before join removal (see + * generate_base_implied_equalities). + */ +} + +/* + * split_selfjoin_quals + * Processes 'joinquals' building two lists, one with a list of quals + * where the columns/exprs on either side of the join match and another + * list containing the remaining quals. + * + * 'joinquals' must only contain quals for a RTE_RELATION being joined to + * itself. + */ +static void +split_selfjoin_quals(PlannerInfo *root, List *joinquals, List **selfjoinquals, + List **otherjoinquals) +{ + ListCell *lc; + List *sjoinquals = NIL; + List *ojoinquals = NIL; + + foreach(lc, joinquals) + { + RestrictInfo *rinfo = lfirst_node(RestrictInfo, lc); + OpExpr *expr; + Expr *leftexpr; + Expr *rightexpr; + + /* In general, clause looks like F(arg1) = G(arg2) ? */ + if (!rinfo->mergeopfamilies || + bms_num_members(rinfo->clause_relids) != 2 || + bms_num_members(rinfo->left_relids) != 1 || + bms_num_members(rinfo->right_relids) != 1) + { + ojoinquals = lappend(ojoinquals, rinfo); + continue; + } + + expr = (OpExpr *) rinfo->clause; + + if (!IsA(expr, OpExpr) || list_length(expr->args) != 2) + { + ojoinquals = lappend(ojoinquals, rinfo); + continue; + } + + leftexpr = (Expr *) copyObject(get_leftop(rinfo->clause)); + rightexpr = (Expr *) copyObject(get_rightop(rinfo->clause)); + + /* Can't match of the exprs are not of the same type */ + if (leftexpr->type != rightexpr->type) + { + ojoinquals = lappend(ojoinquals, rinfo); + continue; + } + + change_varno(rightexpr, + bms_next_member(rinfo->right_relids, -1), + bms_next_member(rinfo->left_relids, -1)); + + if (equal(leftexpr, rightexpr)) + sjoinquals = lappend(sjoinquals, rinfo); + else + ojoinquals = lappend(ojoinquals, rinfo); + } + + *selfjoinquals = sjoinquals; + *otherjoinquals = ojoinquals; +} + +/* + * Check for a case when uniqueness [partly] derived from a baserestrictinfo + * clause. In this case we have a chance to return only one row (if such + * clauses on both sides of SJ is equal) or nothing - if they are different. + */ +static bool +match_unique_clauses(RelOptInfo *outer, List *uclauses, Index relid) +{ + ListCell *lc; + + foreach(lc, uclauses) + { + RestrictInfo *rinfo = lfirst_node(RestrictInfo, lc); + Expr *clause; + Node *iclause; + Node *c1; + bool matched = false; + ListCell *olc; + + Assert(outer->relid > 0 && relid > 0); + + /* Only filters like f(R.x1,...,R.xN) == expr we should consider. */ + Assert(bms_is_empty(rinfo->left_relids) || + bms_is_empty(rinfo->right_relids)); + + clause = (Expr *) copyObject(rinfo->clause); + change_varno(clause, relid, outer->relid); + + c1 = (rinfo->outer_is_left ? get_leftop(clause) : get_rightop(clause)); + iclause = (rinfo->outer_is_left ? + get_rightop(clause) : get_leftop(clause)); + + /* + * Compare these left and right sides with corresponding sides of the + * outer's filters. If no one detected - return immediately. + */ + foreach(olc, outer->baserestrictinfo) + { + RestrictInfo *orinfo = lfirst_node(RestrictInfo, olc); + Node *oclause; + Node *c2; + + if (orinfo->mergeopfamilies == NIL) + /* Don't consider clauses which aren't similar to 'F(X)=G(Y)' */ + continue; + + oclause = (bms_is_empty(orinfo->left_relids) ? + get_rightop(orinfo->clause) : get_leftop(orinfo->clause)); + c2 = (bms_is_empty(orinfo->left_relids) ? + get_leftop(orinfo->clause) : get_rightop(orinfo->clause)); + + if (equal(iclause, oclause) && equal(c1, c2)) + { + matched = true; + break; + } + } + + if (!matched) + return false; + } + + return true; +} + +/* + * Find and remove unique self joins in a group of base relations that have + * the same Oid. + * + * Returns a set of relids that were removed. + */ +static Relids +remove_self_joins_one_group(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids) +{ + Relids joinrelids = NULL; + Relids result = NULL; + int k; /* Index of kept relation */ + int r = -1; /* Index of removed relation */ + + if (bms_num_members(relids) < 2) + return NULL; + + while ((r = bms_next_member(relids, r)) > 0) + { + RelOptInfo *outer = root->simple_rel_array[r]; + + k = r; + + while ((k = bms_next_member(relids, k)) > 0) + { + RelOptInfo *inner = root->simple_rel_array[k]; + List *restrictlist; + List *selfjoinquals; + List *otherjoinquals; + ListCell *lc; + bool jinfo_check = true; + PlanRowMark *omark = NULL; + PlanRowMark *imark = NULL; + List *uclauses = NIL; + + /* A sanity check: the relations have the same Oid. */ + Assert(root->simple_rte_array[k]->relid == + root->simple_rte_array[r]->relid); + + /* + * It is impossible to optimize two relations if they belong to + * different rules of order restriction. Otherwise planner can't + * be able to find any variants of correct query plan. + */ + foreach(lc, root->join_info_list) + { + SpecialJoinInfo *info = (SpecialJoinInfo *) lfirst(lc); + + if ((bms_is_member(k, info->syn_lefthand) ^ + bms_is_member(r, info->syn_lefthand)) || + (bms_is_member(k, info->syn_righthand) ^ + bms_is_member(r, info->syn_righthand))) + { + jinfo_check = false; + break; + } + } + + if (!jinfo_check) + continue; + + /* Reuse joinrelids bitset to avoid reallocation. */ + joinrelids = bms_del_members(joinrelids, joinrelids); + + /* + * We only deal with base rels here, so their relids bitset + * contains only one member -- their relid. + */ + joinrelids = bms_add_member(joinrelids, r); + joinrelids = bms_add_member(joinrelids, k); + + /* + * At this stage joininfo lists of inner and outer can contain + * only clauses, required for a superior outer join that can't + * influence on this optimization. So, we can avoid to call the + * build_joinrel_restrictlist() routine. + */ + restrictlist = generate_join_implied_equalities(root, joinrelids, + outer->relids, + inner); + + /* + * Process restrictlist to seperate out the self join quals from + * the other quals. e.g x = x goes to selfjoinquals and a = b to + * otherjoinquals. + */ + split_selfjoin_quals(root, restrictlist, &selfjoinquals, + &otherjoinquals); + + /* Is it an unique self join? */ + + if (list_length(selfjoinquals) == 0) + { + /* + * XXX: we would detect self-join without quals like 'x==x' if + * we had an foreign key constraint on some of other quals and + * this join haven't any columns from the outer in the target + * list. But it is still complex task. + */ + continue; + } + + /* + * Determine if the inner table can duplicate outer rows. We must + * bypass the unique rel cache here since we're possibly using a + * subset of join quals. We can use 'force_cache' = true when all + * join quals are selfjoin quals. Otherwise we could end up + * putting false negatives in the cache. + */ + if (!innerrel_is_unique_ext(root, joinrelids, outer->relids, + inner, JOIN_INNER, selfjoinquals, + list_length(otherjoinquals) == 0, + &uclauses)) + continue; + + /* + * We have proven that for both relations, the same unique index + * guarantees that there is at most one row where columns equal + * given values. These values must be the same for both relations, + * or else we won't match the same row on each side of join. + */ + if (!match_unique_clauses(outer, uclauses, inner->relid)) + continue; + + /* See for row marks. */ + foreach(lc, root->rowMarks) + { + PlanRowMark *rowMark = (PlanRowMark *) lfirst(lc); + + if (rowMark->rti == k) + { + Assert(imark == NULL); + imark = rowMark; + } + else if (rowMark->rti == r) + { + Assert(omark == NULL); + omark = rowMark; + } + + if (omark && imark) + break; + } + + /* + * We can't remove the join if the relations have row marks of + * different strength (e.g. one is locked FOR UPDATE and another + * just has ROW_MARK_REFERENCE for EvalPlanQual rechecking). + */ + if (omark && imark && omark->markType != imark->markType) + continue; + + /* + * Be safe to do not remove table participated in complicated PH + */ + foreach(lc, root->placeholder_list) + { + PlaceHolderInfo *phinfo = (PlaceHolderInfo *) lfirst(lc); + + /* there isn't any other place to eval PHV */ + if (bms_is_subset(phinfo->ph_eval_at, joinrelids) || + bms_is_subset(phinfo->ph_needed, joinrelids)) + break; + } + + if (lc) + continue; + + /* + * We can remove either relation, so remove the outer one, to + * simplify this loop. + */ + + /* + * Attach the restrictions to removing relation to simplify relids + * replacing procedure. joininfo clauses of removing relation will + * be moved to the keeping by the remove_rel_from_query(). + */ + outer->baserestrictinfo = list_concat(outer->baserestrictinfo, + restrictlist); + + /* Firstly, replace index of excluding relation with keeping. */ + remove_rel_from_query(root, outer->relid, joinrelids, inner->relid); + + /* Secondly, fix restrictions of keeping relation */ + remove_self_join_rel(root, imark, omark, inner, outer); + result = bms_add_member(result, r); + + /* We removed the outer relation, try the next one. */ + break; + } + } + + return result; +} + +/* + * Iteratively form a group of relation indexes with the same oid and launch + * the routine that detects self-joins in this group and removes excessive + * range table entries. + * + * At the end of iteration, exclude the group from the overall relids list. + * So each next iteration of the cycle will involve less and less value of + * relids. + */ +static Relids +remove_self_joins_one_level(PlannerInfo *root, Relids relids, Relids ToRemove) +{ + while (!bms_is_empty(relids)) + { + Relids group = NULL; + Oid groupOid; + int i; + + i = bms_first_member(relids); + groupOid = root->simple_rte_array[i]->relid; + Assert(OidIsValid(groupOid)); + group = bms_add_member(group, i); + + /* Create group of relation indexes with the same oid. */ + while ((i = bms_next_member(relids, i)) > 0) + { + RangeTblEntry *rte = root->simple_rte_array[i]; + + Assert(OidIsValid(rte->relid)); + + if (rte->relid == groupOid) + group = bms_add_member(group, i); + } + + relids = bms_del_members(relids, group); + ToRemove = bms_add_members(ToRemove, + remove_self_joins_one_group(root, group)); + bms_free(group); + } + return ToRemove; +} + +/* + * For each level of joinlist form a set of base relations and launch the + * routine of the self-join removal optimization. Recurse into sub-joinlists to + * handle deeper levels. + */ +static Relids +remove_self_joins_recurse(PlannerInfo *root, List *joinlist, Relids ToRemove) +{ + ListCell *lc; + Relids relids = NULL; + + /* Collect the ids of base relations at one level of the join tree. */ + foreach(lc, joinlist) + { + switch (((Node *) lfirst(lc))->type) + { + case T_List: + /* Recursively go inside the sub-joinlist */ + ToRemove = remove_self_joins_recurse(root, + (List *) lfirst(lc), + ToRemove); + break; + case T_RangeTblRef: + { + RangeTblRef *ref = (RangeTblRef *) lfirst(lc); + RangeTblEntry *rte = root->simple_rte_array[ref->rtindex]; + + /* + * We only care about base relations from which we select + * something. + */ + if (rte->rtekind != RTE_RELATION || + rte->relkind != RELKIND_RELATION || + root->simple_rel_array[ref->rtindex] == NULL) + break; + + Assert(!bms_is_member(ref->rtindex, relids)); + relids = bms_add_member(relids, ref->rtindex); + + /* + * Limit the number of joins we process to control the + * quadratic behavior. + */ + if (bms_num_members(relids) > join_collapse_limit) + break; + } + break; + default: + Assert(false); + } + } + + if (bms_num_members(relids) >= 2) + ToRemove = remove_self_joins_one_level(root, relids, ToRemove); + + bms_free(relids); + return ToRemove; +} + +/* + * Find and remove useless self joins. + * + * We search for joins where the same relation is joined to itself on all + * columns of some unique index. If this condition holds, then, for + * each outer row, only one inner row matches, and it is the same row + * of the same relation. This allows us to remove the join and replace + * it with a scan that combines WHERE clauses from both sides. The join + * clauses themselves assume the form of X = X and can be replaced with + * NOT NULL clauses. + * + * For the sake of simplicity, we don't apply this optimization to special + * joins. Here is a list of what we could do in some particular cases: + * 'a a1 semi join a a2': is reduced to inner by reduce_unique_semijoins, + * and then removed normally. + * 'a a1 anti join a a2': could simplify to a scan with 'outer quals AND + * (IS NULL on join columns OR NOT inner quals)'. + * 'a a1 left join a a2': could simplify to a scan like inner, but without + * NOT NULL conditions on join columns. + * 'a a1 left join (a a2 join b)': can't simplify this, because join to b + * can both remove rows and introduce duplicates. + * + * To search for removable joins, we order all the relations on their Oid, + * go over each set with the same Oid, and consider each pair of relations + * in this set. We check that both relation are made unique by the same + * unique index with the same clauses. + * + * To remove the join, we mark one of the participating relations as + * dead, and rewrite all references to it to point to the remaining + * relation. This includes modifying RestrictInfos, EquivalenceClasses and + * EquivalenceMembers. We also have to modify the row marks. The join clauses + * of the removed relation become either restriction or join clauses, based on + * whether they reference any relations not participating in the removed join. + * + * 'targetlist' is the top-level targetlist of query. If it has any references + * to the removed relations, we update them to point to the remaining ones. + */ +List * +remove_useless_self_joins(PlannerInfo *root, List *joinlist) +{ + Relids ToRemove = NULL; + int relid = -1; + + if (!enable_self_join_removal) + return joinlist; + + /* + * Merge pairs of relations participated in self-join. Remove unnecessary + * range table entries. + */ + ToRemove = remove_self_joins_recurse(root, joinlist, ToRemove); + while ((relid = bms_next_member(ToRemove, relid)) >= 0) + { + int nremoved = 0; + + joinlist = remove_rel_from_joinlist(joinlist, relid, &nremoved); + } + + return joinlist; } diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/plan/planmain.c b/src/backend/optimizer/plan/planmain.c index 248cde4d9b..f35d1b6e54 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/plan/planmain.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/plan/planmain.c @@ -228,6 +228,11 @@ query_planner(PlannerInfo *root, */ reduce_unique_semijoins(root); + /* + * Remove self joins on a unique column. + */ + joinlist = remove_useless_self_joins(root, joinlist); + /* * Now distribute "placeholders" to base rels as needed. This has to be * done after join removal because removal could change whether a diff --git a/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c b/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c index 9fbbfb1be5..0c007c23e4 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/misc/guc.c @@ -1226,6 +1226,16 @@ static struct config_bool ConfigureNamesBool[] = true, NULL, NULL, NULL }, + { + {"enable_self_join_removal", PGC_USERSET, QUERY_TUNING_METHOD, + gettext_noop("Enable removal of unique self-joins."), + NULL, + GUC_EXPLAIN | GUC_NOT_IN_SAMPLE + }, + &enable_self_join_removal, + true, + NULL, NULL, NULL + }, { {"geqo", PGC_USERSET, QUERY_TUNING_GEQO, gettext_noop("Enables genetic query optimization."), diff --git a/src/include/optimizer/paths.h b/src/include/optimizer/paths.h index d11cdac7f8..e5f5439894 100644 --- a/src/include/optimizer/paths.h +++ b/src/include/optimizer/paths.h @@ -76,6 +76,9 @@ extern void create_index_paths(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel); extern bool relation_has_unique_index_for(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel, List *restrictlist, List *exprlist, List *oprlist); +extern bool relation_has_unique_index_ext(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel, + List *restrictlist, List *exprlist, + List *oprlist, List **extra_clauses); extern bool indexcol_is_bool_constant_for_query(PlannerInfo *root, IndexOptInfo *index, int indexcol); diff --git a/src/include/optimizer/planmain.h b/src/include/optimizer/planmain.h index 1566f435b3..296c11b8a1 100644 --- a/src/include/optimizer/planmain.h +++ b/src/include/optimizer/planmain.h @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ /* GUC parameters */ #define DEFAULT_CURSOR_TUPLE_FRACTION 0.1 extern PGDLLIMPORT double cursor_tuple_fraction; +extern PGDLLIMPORT bool enable_self_join_removal; /* query_planner callback to compute query_pathkeys */ typedef void (*query_pathkeys_callback) (PlannerInfo *root, void *extra); @@ -107,6 +108,11 @@ extern bool query_is_distinct_for(Query *query, List *colnos, List *opids); extern bool innerrel_is_unique(PlannerInfo *root, Relids joinrelids, Relids outerrelids, RelOptInfo *innerrel, JoinType jointype, List *restrictlist, bool force_cache); +extern bool innerrel_is_unique_ext(PlannerInfo *root, Relids joinrelids, + Relids outerrelids, RelOptInfo *innerrel, + JoinType jointype, List *restrictlist, + bool force_cache, List **uclauses); +extern List *remove_useless_self_joins(PlannerInfo *root, List *jointree); /* * prototypes for plan/setrefs.c diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/equivclass.out b/src/test/regress/expected/equivclass.out index 126f7047fe..de71441052 100644 --- a/src/test/regress/expected/equivclass.out +++ b/src/test/regress/expected/equivclass.out @@ -430,6 +430,38 @@ explain (costs off) Filter: ((unique1 IS NOT NULL) AND (unique2 IS NOT NULL)) (2 rows) +-- Test that broken ECs are processed correctly during self join removal. +-- Disable merge joins so that we don't get an error about missing commutator. +-- Test both orientations of the join clause, because only one of them breaks +-- the EC. +set enable_mergejoin to off; +explain (costs off) + select * from ec0 m join ec0 n on m.ff = n.ff + join ec1 p on m.ff + n.ff = p.f1; + QUERY PLAN +---------------------------------------- + Nested Loop + Join Filter: ((n.ff + n.ff) = p.f1) + -> Seq Scan on ec1 p + -> Materialize + -> Seq Scan on ec0 n + Filter: (ff IS NOT NULL) +(6 rows) + +explain (costs off) + select * from ec0 m join ec0 n on m.ff = n.ff + join ec1 p on p.f1::int8 = (m.ff + n.ff)::int8alias1; + QUERY PLAN +--------------------------------------------------------------- + Nested Loop + Join Filter: ((p.f1)::bigint = ((n.ff + n.ff))::int8alias1) + -> Seq Scan on ec1 p + -> Materialize + -> Seq Scan on ec0 n + Filter: (ff IS NOT NULL) +(6 rows) + +reset enable_mergejoin; -- this could be converted, but isn't at present explain (costs off) select * from tenk1 where unique1 = unique1 or unique2 = unique2; diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/join.out b/src/test/regress/expected/join.out index 2ed2e542a4..9c83fc76e5 100644 --- a/src/test/regress/expected/join.out +++ b/src/test/regress/expected/join.out @@ -4982,6 +4982,741 @@ select * from ----+----+----+---- (0 rows) +-- +-- test that semi- or inner self-joins on a unique column are removed +-- +-- enable only nestloop to get more predictable plans +set enable_hashjoin to off; +set enable_mergejoin to off; +create table sj (a int unique, b int, c int unique); +insert into sj values (1, null, 2), (null, 2, null), (2, 1, 1); +analyze sj; +-- Trivial self-join case. +explain (costs off) +select p.* from sj p, sj q where q.a = p.a and q.b = q.a - 1; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------- + Seq Scan on sj q + Filter: ((a IS NOT NULL) AND (b = (a - 1))) +(2 rows) + +select p.* from sj p, sj q where q.a = p.a and q.b = q.a - 1; + a | b | c +---+---+--- + 2 | 1 | 1 +(1 row) + +-- Self-join removal performs after a subquery pull-up process and could remove +-- such kind of self-join too. Check this option. +explain (costs off) +select * from sj p +where exists (select * from sj q + where q.a = p.a and q.b < 10); + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------ + Seq Scan on sj q + Filter: ((a IS NOT NULL) AND (b < 10)) +(2 rows) + +select * from sj p where exists (select * from sj q where q.a = p.a and q.b < 10); + a | b | c +---+---+--- + 2 | 1 | 1 +(1 row) + +-- Don't remove self-join for the case of equality of two different unique columns. +explain (costs off) +select * from sj t1, sj t2 where t1.a = t2.c and t1.b is not null; + QUERY PLAN +--------------------------------------- + Nested Loop + Join Filter: (t1.a = t2.c) + -> Seq Scan on sj t2 + -> Materialize + -> Seq Scan on sj t1 + Filter: (b IS NOT NULL) +(6 rows) + +-- Degenerated case. +explain (costs off) +select * from + (select a as x from sj where false) as q1, + (select a as y from sj where false) as q2 +where q1.x = q2.y; + QUERY PLAN +--------------------------------- + Result + One-Time Filter: false + -> Seq Scan on sj + Filter: (a IS NOT NULL) +(4 rows) + +-- We can't use a cross-EC generated self join qual because of current logic of +-- the generate_join_implied_equalities routine. +explain (costs off) +select * from sj t1, sj t2 where t1.a = t1.b and t1.b = t2.b and t2.b = t2.a; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------ + Nested Loop + Join Filter: (t1.a = t2.b) + -> Seq Scan on sj t1 + Filter: (a = b) + -> Seq Scan on sj t2 + Filter: (b = a) +(6 rows) + +explain (costs off) +select * from sj t1, sj t2, sj t3 +where t1.a = t1.b and t1.b = t2.b and t2.b = t2.a + and t1.b = t3.b and t3.b = t3.a; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------ + Nested Loop + Join Filter: (t1.a = t3.b) + -> Nested Loop + Join Filter: (t1.a = t2.b) + -> Seq Scan on sj t1 + Filter: (a = b) + -> Seq Scan on sj t2 + Filter: (b = a) + -> Seq Scan on sj t3 + Filter: (b = a) +(10 rows) + +-- Double self-join removal. +-- Use a condition on "b + 1", not on "b", for the second join, so that +-- the equivalence class is different from the first one, and we can +-- test the non-ec code path. +explain (costs off) +select * from sj t1 join sj t2 on t1.a = t2.a and t1.b = t2.b + join sj t3 on t2.a = t3.a and t2.b + 1 = t3.b + 1; + QUERY PLAN +--------------------------------------------------------------------------- + Seq Scan on sj t3 + Filter: ((a IS NOT NULL) AND (b IS NOT NULL) AND ((b + 1) IS NOT NULL)) +(2 rows) + +-- subselect that references the removed relation +explain (costs off) +select t1.a, (select a from sj where a = t2.a and a = t1.a) +from sj t1, sj t2 +where t1.a = t2.a; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------ + Seq Scan on sj t2 + Filter: (a IS NOT NULL) + SubPlan 1 + -> Result + One-Time Filter: (t2.a = t2.a) + -> Seq Scan on sj + Filter: (a = t2.a) +(7 rows) + +-- self-join under outer join +explain (costs off) +select * from sj x join sj y on x.a = y.a +left join int8_tbl z on x.a = z.q1; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------ + Nested Loop Left Join + Join Filter: (y.a = z.q1) + -> Seq Scan on sj y + Filter: (a IS NOT NULL) + -> Materialize + -> Seq Scan on int8_tbl z +(6 rows) + +explain (costs off) +select * from sj x join sj y on x.a = y.a +left join int8_tbl z on y.a = z.q1; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------ + Nested Loop Left Join + Join Filter: (y.a = z.q1) + -> Seq Scan on sj y + Filter: (a IS NOT NULL) + -> Materialize + -> Seq Scan on int8_tbl z +(6 rows) + +explain (costs off) +SELECT * FROM ( + SELECT t1.*, t2.a AS ax FROM sj t1 JOIN sj t2 + ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c*t1.c = t2.c+2 AND t2.b IS NULL) +) AS q1 +LEFT JOIN + (SELECT t3.* FROM sj t3, sj t4 WHERE t3.c = t4.c) AS q2 +ON q1.ax = q2.a; + QUERY PLAN +--------------------------------------------------------------------------- + Nested Loop Left Join + Join Filter: (t2.a = t4.a) + -> Seq Scan on sj t2 + Filter: ((b IS NULL) AND (a IS NOT NULL) AND ((c * c) = (c + 2))) + -> Seq Scan on sj t4 + Filter: (c IS NOT NULL) +(6 rows) + +-- Test that placeholders are updated correctly after join removal +explain (costs off) +select * from (values (1)) x +left join (select coalesce(y.q1, 1) from int8_tbl y + right join sj j1 inner join sj j2 on j1.a = j2.a + on true) z +on true; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------ + Nested Loop Left Join + -> Result + -> Nested Loop Left Join + -> Seq Scan on sj j2 + Filter: (a IS NOT NULL) + -> Materialize + -> Seq Scan on int8_tbl y +(7 rows) + +-- +-- SJR corner case: uniqueness of an inner is [partially] derived from +-- baserestrictinfo clauses. +-- XXX: We really should allow SJR for these corner cases? +-- +INSERT INTO sj VALUES (3, 1, 3); +explain (costs off) -- Don't remove SJ + SELECT * FROM sj j1, sj j2 WHERE j1.b = j2.b AND j1.a = 2 AND j2.a = 3; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------ + Nested Loop + Join Filter: (j1.b = j2.b) + -> Seq Scan on sj j1 + Filter: (a = 2) + -> Seq Scan on sj j2 + Filter: (a = 3) +(6 rows) + +SELECT * FROM sj j1, sj j2 +WHERE j1.b = j2.b AND j1.a = 2 AND j2.a = 3; -- Return one row + a | b | c | a | b | c +---+---+---+---+---+--- + 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 +(1 row) + +explain (costs off) -- Remove SJ, define uniqueness by a constant + SELECT * FROM sj j1, sj j2 WHERE j1.b = j2.b AND j1.a = 2 AND j2.a = 2; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------- + Seq Scan on sj j2 + Filter: ((b IS NOT NULL) AND (a = 2)) +(2 rows) + +SELECT * FROM sj j1, sj j2 +WHERE j1.b = j2.b AND j1.a = 2 AND j2.a = 2; -- Return one row + a | b | c | a | b | c +---+---+---+---+---+--- + 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 +(1 row) + +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM sj j1, sj j2 +WHERE j1.b = j2.b + AND j1.a = (EXTRACT(DOW FROM current_timestamp(0))/15 + 3)::int + AND (EXTRACT(DOW FROM current_timestamp(0))/15 + 3)::int = j2.a +; -- Remove SJ, define uniqueness by a constant expression + QUERY PLAN +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + Seq Scan on sj j2 + Filter: ((b IS NOT NULL) AND (a = (((EXTRACT(dow FROM CURRENT_TIMESTAMP(0)) / '15'::numeric) + '3'::numeric))::integer)) +(2 rows) + +SELECT * FROM sj j1, sj j2 +WHERE j1.b = j2.b + AND j1.a = (EXTRACT(DOW FROM current_timestamp(0))/15 + 3)::int + AND (EXTRACT(DOW FROM current_timestamp(0))/15 + 3)::int = j2.a +; -- Return one row + a | b | c | a | b | c +---+---+---+---+---+--- + 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 +(1 row) + +explain (costs off) -- Remove SJ + SELECT * FROM sj j1, sj j2 WHERE j1.b = j2.b AND j1.a = 1 AND j2.a = 1; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------- + Seq Scan on sj j2 + Filter: ((b IS NOT NULL) AND (a = 1)) +(2 rows) + +SELECT * FROM sj j1, sj j2 +WHERE j1.b = j2.b AND j1.a = 1 AND j2.a = 1; -- Return no rows + a | b | c | a | b | c +---+---+---+---+---+--- +(0 rows) + +explain (costs off) -- Shuffle a clause. Remove SJ + SELECT * FROM sj j1, sj j2 WHERE j1.b = j2.b AND 1 = j1.a AND j2.a = 1; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------- + Seq Scan on sj j2 + Filter: ((b IS NOT NULL) AND (a = 1)) +(2 rows) + +SELECT * FROM sj j1, sj j2 +WHERE j1.b = j2.b AND 1 = j1.a AND j2.a = 1; -- Return no rows + a | b | c | a | b | c +---+---+---+---+---+--- +(0 rows) + +-- Functional index +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX sj_fn_idx ON sj((a * a)); +explain (costs off) -- Remove SJ + SELECT * FROM sj j1, sj j2 + WHERE j1.b = j2.b AND j1.a*j1.a = 1 AND j2.a*j2.a = 1; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------- + Seq Scan on sj j2 + Filter: ((b IS NOT NULL) AND ((a * a) = 1)) +(2 rows) + +explain (costs off) -- Don't remove SJ + SELECT * FROM sj j1, sj j2 + WHERE j1.b = j2.b AND j1.a*j1.a = 1 AND j2.a*j2.a = 2; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------- + Nested Loop + Join Filter: (j1.b = j2.b) + -> Seq Scan on sj j1 + Filter: ((a * a) = 1) + -> Seq Scan on sj j2 + Filter: ((a * a) = 2) +(6 rows) + +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM sj j1, sj j2 +WHERE j1.b = j2.b + AND (j1.a*j1.a) = (EXTRACT(DOW FROM current_timestamp(0))/15 + 3)::int + AND (EXTRACT(DOW FROM current_timestamp(0))/15 + 3)::int = (j2.a*j2.a) +; -- Restriction contains expressions in both sides, Remove SJ. + QUERY PLAN +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + Seq Scan on sj j2 + Filter: ((b IS NOT NULL) AND ((a * a) = (((EXTRACT(dow FROM CURRENT_TIMESTAMP(0)) / '15'::numeric) + '3'::numeric))::integer)) +(2 rows) + +SELECT * FROM sj j1, sj j2 +WHERE j1.b = j2.b + AND (j1.a*j1.a) = (EXTRACT(DOW FROM current_timestamp(0))/15 + 3)::int + AND (EXTRACT(DOW FROM current_timestamp(0))/15 + 3)::int = (j2.a*j2.a) +; -- Empty set of rows should be returned + a | b | c | a | b | c +---+---+---+---+---+--- +(0 rows) + +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM sj j1, sj j2 +WHERE j1.b = j2.b + AND (j1.a*j1.a) = (random()/3 + 3)::int + AND (random()/3 + 3)::int = (j2.a*j2.a) +; -- Restriction contains volatile function - disable SJR feature. + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + Nested Loop + Join Filter: (j1.b = j2.b) + -> Seq Scan on sj j1 + Filter: ((a * a) = (((random() / '3'::double precision) + '3'::double precision))::integer) + -> Seq Scan on sj j2 + Filter: ((((random() / '3'::double precision) + '3'::double precision))::integer = (a * a)) +(6 rows) + +SELECT * FROM sj j1, sj j2 +WHERE j1.b = j2.b + AND (j1.a*j1.c/3) = (random()/3 + 3)::int + AND (random()/3 + 3)::int = (j2.a*j2.c/3) +; -- Return one row + a | b | c | a | b | c +---+---+---+---+---+--- + 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 +(1 row) + +-- Multiple filters +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX sj_temp_idx1 ON sj(a,b,c); +explain (costs off) -- Remove SJ + SELECT * FROM sj j1, sj j2 + WHERE j1.b = j2.b AND j1.a = 2 AND j1.c = 3 AND j2.a = 2 AND 3 = j2.c; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------------- + Seq Scan on sj j2 + Filter: ((b IS NOT NULL) AND (a = 2) AND (c = 3)) +(2 rows) + +explain (costs off) -- Don't remove SJ + SELECT * FROM sj j1, sj j2 + WHERE j1.b = j2.b AND 2 = j1.a AND j1.c = 3 AND j2.a = 1 AND 3 = j2.c; + QUERY PLAN +--------------------------------------- + Nested Loop + Join Filter: (j1.b = j2.b) + -> Seq Scan on sj j1 + Filter: ((2 = a) AND (c = 3)) + -> Seq Scan on sj j2 + Filter: ((c = 3) AND (a = 1)) +(6 rows) + +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX sj_temp_idx ON sj(a,b); +explain (costs off) -- Don't remove SJ + SELECT * FROM sj j1, sj j2 WHERE j1.b = j2.b AND j1.a = 2; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------ + Nested Loop + Join Filter: (j1.b = j2.b) + -> Seq Scan on sj j1 + Filter: (a = 2) + -> Seq Scan on sj j2 +(5 rows) + +explain (costs off) -- Don't remove SJ + SELECT * FROM sj j1, sj j2 WHERE j1.b = j2.b AND 2 = j2.a; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------ + Nested Loop + Join Filter: (j1.b = j2.b) + -> Seq Scan on sj j2 + Filter: (2 = a) + -> Seq Scan on sj j1 +(5 rows) + +explain (costs off) -- Don't remove SJ + SELECT * FROM sj j1, sj j2 WHERE j1.b = j2.b AND (j1.a = 1 OR j2.a = 1); + QUERY PLAN +--------------------------------------------------------------- + Nested Loop + Join Filter: ((j1.b = j2.b) AND ((j1.a = 1) OR (j2.a = 1))) + -> Seq Scan on sj j1 + -> Materialize + -> Seq Scan on sj j2 +(5 rows) + +DROP INDEX sj_fn_idx, sj_temp_idx1, sj_temp_idx; +-- Test that OR predicated are updated correctly after join removal +CREATE TABLE tab_with_flag ( id INT PRIMARY KEY, is_flag SMALLINT); +CREATE INDEX idx_test_is_flag ON tab_with_flag (is_flag); +explain (costs off) +SELECT COUNT(*) FROM tab_with_flag +WHERE + (is_flag IS NULL OR is_flag = 0) + AND id IN (SELECT id FROM tab_with_flag WHERE id IN (2, 3)); + QUERY PLAN +---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + Aggregate + -> Bitmap Heap Scan on tab_with_flag + Recheck Cond: ((id = ANY ('{2,3}'::integer[])) AND (id IS NOT NULL)) + Filter: ((is_flag IS NULL) OR (is_flag = 0)) + -> Bitmap Index Scan on tab_with_flag_pkey + Index Cond: ((id = ANY ('{2,3}'::integer[])) AND (id IS NOT NULL)) +(6 rows) + +DROP TABLE tab_with_flag; +-- HAVING clause +explain (costs off) +select p.b from sj p join sj q on p.a = q.a group by p.b having sum(p.a) = 1; + QUERY PLAN +--------------------------------- + HashAggregate + Group Key: q.b + Filter: (sum(q.a) = 1) + -> Seq Scan on sj q + Filter: (a IS NOT NULL) +(5 rows) + +-- update lateral references and range table entry reference +explain (verbose, costs off) +select 1 from (select x.* from sj x, sj y where x.a = y.a) q, + lateral generate_series(1, q.a) gs(i); + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------------ + Nested Loop + Output: 1 + -> Seq Scan on public.sj y + Output: y.a, y.b, y.c + Filter: (y.a IS NOT NULL) + -> Function Scan on pg_catalog.generate_series gs + Output: gs.i + Function Call: generate_series(1, y.a) +(8 rows) + +explain (verbose, costs off) +select 1 from (select y.* from sj x, sj y where x.a = y.a) q, + lateral generate_series(1, q.a) gs(i); + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------------ + Nested Loop + Output: 1 + -> Seq Scan on public.sj y + Output: y.a, y.b, y.c + Filter: (y.a IS NOT NULL) + -> Function Scan on pg_catalog.generate_series gs + Output: gs.i + Function Call: generate_series(1, y.a) +(8 rows) + +-- Test that a non-EC-derived join clause is processed correctly. Use an +-- outer join so that we can't form an EC. +explain (costs off) select * from sj p join sj q on p.a = q.a + left join sj r on p.a + q.a = r.a; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------ + Nested Loop Left Join + Join Filter: ((q.a + q.a) = r.a) + -> Seq Scan on sj q + Filter: (a IS NOT NULL) + -> Materialize + -> Seq Scan on sj r +(6 rows) + +-- FIXME this constant false filter doesn't look good. Should we merge +-- equivalence classes? +explain (costs off) +select * from sj p, sj q where p.a = q.a and p.b = 1 and q.b = 2; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------------- + Seq Scan on sj q + Filter: ((a IS NOT NULL) AND (b = 2) AND (b = 1)) +(2 rows) + +-- Check that attr_needed is updated correctly after self-join removal. In this +-- test, the join of j1 with j2 is removed. k1.b is required at either j1 or j2. +-- If this info is lost, join targetlist for (k1, k2) will not contain k1.b. +-- Use index scan for k1 so that we don't get 'b' from physical tlist used for +-- seqscan. Also disable reordering of joins because this test depends on a +-- particular join tree. +create table sk (a int, b int); +create index on sk(a); +set join_collapse_limit to 1; +set enable_seqscan to off; +explain (costs off) select 1 from + (sk k1 join sk k2 on k1.a = k2.a) + join (sj j1 join sj j2 on j1.a = j2.a) on j1.b = k1.b; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------------- + Nested Loop + Join Filter: (k1.b = j2.b) + -> Nested Loop + -> Index Scan using sk_a_idx on sk k1 + -> Index Only Scan using sk_a_idx on sk k2 + Index Cond: (a = k1.a) + -> Materialize + -> Index Scan using sj_a_key on sj j2 + Index Cond: (a IS NOT NULL) +(9 rows) + +explain (costs off) select 1 from + (sk k1 join sk k2 on k1.a = k2.a) + join (sj j1 join sj j2 on j1.a = j2.a) on j2.b = k1.b; + QUERY PLAN +----------------------------------------------------- + Nested Loop + Join Filter: (k1.b = j2.b) + -> Nested Loop + -> Index Scan using sk_a_idx on sk k1 + -> Index Only Scan using sk_a_idx on sk k2 + Index Cond: (a = k1.a) + -> Materialize + -> Index Scan using sj_a_key on sj j2 + Index Cond: (a IS NOT NULL) +(9 rows) + +reset join_collapse_limit; +reset enable_seqscan; +-- Check that clauses from the join filter list is not lost on the self-join removal +CREATE TABLE emp1 ( id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY NOT NULL, code int); +explain (verbose, costs off) +SELECT * FROM emp1 e1, emp1 e2 WHERE e1.id = e2.id AND e2.code <> e1.code; + QUERY PLAN +---------------------------------------------------------- + Seq Scan on public.emp1 e2 + Output: e2.id, e2.code, e2.id, e2.code + Filter: ((e2.id IS NOT NULL) AND (e2.code <> e2.code)) +(3 rows) + +-- We can remove the join even if we find the join can't duplicate rows and +-- the base quals of each side are different. In the following case we end up +-- moving quals over to s1 to make it so it can't match any rows. +create table sl(a int, b int, c int); +create unique index on sl(a, b); +vacuum analyze sl; +-- Both sides are unique, but base quals are different +explain (costs off) +select * from sl t1, sl t2 where t1.a = t2.a and t1.b = 1 and t2.b = 2; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------ + Nested Loop + Join Filter: (t1.a = t2.a) + -> Seq Scan on sl t1 + Filter: (b = 1) + -> Seq Scan on sl t2 + Filter: (b = 2) +(6 rows) + +-- Check NullTest in baserestrictinfo list +explain (costs off) +select * from sl t1, sl t2 +where t1.a = t2.a and t1.b = 1 and t2.b = 2 + and t1.c IS NOT NULL and t2.c IS NOT NULL + and t2.b IS NOT NULL and t1.b IS NOT NULL + and t1.a IS NOT NULL and t2.a IS NOT NULL; + QUERY PLAN +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + Nested Loop + Join Filter: (t1.a = t2.a) + -> Seq Scan on sl t1 + Filter: ((c IS NOT NULL) AND (b IS NOT NULL) AND (a IS NOT NULL) AND (b = 1)) + -> Seq Scan on sl t2 + Filter: ((c IS NOT NULL) AND (b IS NOT NULL) AND (a IS NOT NULL) AND (b = 2)) +(6 rows) + +explain (verbose, costs off) +select * from sl t1, sl t2 +where t1.b = t2.b and t2.a = 3 and t1.a = 3 + and t1.c IS NOT NULL and t2.c IS NOT NULL + and t2.b IS NOT NULL and t1.b IS NOT NULL + and t1.a IS NOT NULL and t2.a IS NOT NULL; + QUERY PLAN +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + Seq Scan on public.sl t2 + Output: t2.a, t2.b, t2.c, t2.a, t2.b, t2.c + Filter: ((t2.c IS NOT NULL) AND (t2.b IS NOT NULL) AND (t2.a IS NOT NULL) AND (t2.a = 3)) +(3 rows) + +-- Join qual isn't mergejoinable, but inner is unique. +explain (COSTS OFF) +SELECT n2.a FROM sj n1, sj n2 WHERE n1.a <> n2.a AND n2.a = 1; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------- + Nested Loop + Join Filter: (n1.a <> n2.a) + -> Seq Scan on sj n2 + Filter: (a = 1) + -> Seq Scan on sj n1 +(5 rows) + +explain (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM + (SELECT n2.a FROM sj n1, sj n2 WHERE n1.a <> n2.a) q0, sl +WHERE q0.a = 1; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------- + Nested Loop + Join Filter: (n1.a <> n2.a) + -> Nested Loop + -> Seq Scan on sl + -> Seq Scan on sj n2 + Filter: (a = 1) + -> Seq Scan on sj n1 +(7 rows) + +-- +---- Only one side is unqiue +--select * from sl t1, sl t2 where t1.a = t2.a and t1.b = 1; +--select * from sl t1, sl t2 where t1.a = t2.a and t2.b = 1; +-- +---- Several uniques indexes match, and we select a different one +---- for each side, so the join is not removed +--create table sm(a int unique, b int unique, c int unique); +--explain (costs off) +--select * from sm m, sm n where m.a = n.b and m.c = n.c; +--explain (costs off) +--select * from sm m, sm n where m.a = n.c and m.b = n.b; +--explain (costs off) +--select * from sm m, sm n where m.c = n.b and m.a = n.a; +-- Check optimization disabling if it will violate special join conditions. +-- Two identical joined relations satisfies self join removal conditions but +-- stay in different special join infos. +CREATE TABLE sj_t1 (id serial, a int); +CREATE TABLE sj_t2 (id serial, a int); +CREATE TABLE sj_t3 (id serial, a int); +CREATE TABLE sj_t4 (id serial, a int); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON sj_t3 USING btree (a,id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON sj_t2 USING btree (id); +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM sj_t1 +JOIN ( + SELECT sj_t2.id AS id FROM sj_t2 + WHERE EXISTS + ( + SELECT TRUE FROM sj_t3,sj_t4 WHERE sj_t3.a = 1 AND sj_t3.id = sj_t2.id + ) + ) t2t3t4 +ON sj_t1.id = t2t3t4.id +JOIN ( + SELECT sj_t2.id AS id FROM sj_t2 + WHERE EXISTS + ( + SELECT TRUE FROM sj_t3,sj_t4 WHERE sj_t3.a = 1 AND sj_t3.id = sj_t2.id + ) + ) _t2t3t4 +ON sj_t1.id = _t2t3t4.id; + QUERY PLAN +------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + Nested Loop + Join Filter: (sj_t3.id = sj_t1.id) + -> Nested Loop + Join Filter: (sj_t3.id = sj_t2.id) + -> Nested Loop Semi Join + -> Nested Loop + -> HashAggregate + Group Key: sj_t3.id + -> Nested Loop + -> Seq Scan on sj_t4 + -> Materialize + -> Bitmap Heap Scan on sj_t3 + Recheck Cond: (a = 1) + -> Bitmap Index Scan on sj_t3_a_id_idx + Index Cond: (a = 1) + -> Index Only Scan using sj_t2_id_idx on sj_t2 sj_t2_1 + Index Cond: (id = sj_t3.id) + -> Nested Loop + -> Index Only Scan using sj_t3_a_id_idx on sj_t3 sj_t3_1 + Index Cond: ((a = 1) AND (id = sj_t3.id)) + -> Seq Scan on sj_t4 sj_t4_1 + -> Index Only Scan using sj_t2_id_idx on sj_t2 + Index Cond: (id = sj_t2_1.id) + -> Seq Scan on sj_t1 +(24 rows) + +-- +-- Test RowMarks-related code +-- +-- TODO: Why this select returns two coies of ctid field? Should we fix it? +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) -- Both sides have explicit LockRows marks +SELECT a1.a FROM sj a1,sj a2 WHERE (a1.a=a2.a) FOR UPDATE; + QUERY PLAN +--------------------------------- + LockRows + -> Seq Scan on sj a2 + Filter: (a IS NOT NULL) +(3 rows) + +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) -- A RowMark exists for the table being kept +UPDATE sj sq SET b = 1 FROM sj as sz WHERE sq.a = sz.a; + QUERY PLAN +--------------------------------- + Update on sj sq + -> Seq Scan on sj sz + Filter: (a IS NOT NULL) +(3 rows) + +CREATE RULE sj_del_rule AS ON DELETE TO sj + DO INSTEAD + UPDATE sj SET a = 1 WHERE a = old.a; +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) DELETE FROM sj; -- A RowMark exists for the table being dropped + QUERY PLAN +--------------------------------- + Update on sj + -> Seq Scan on sj + Filter: (a IS NOT NULL) +(3 rows) + +DROP RULE sj_del_rule ON sj CASCADE; +reset enable_hashjoin; +reset enable_mergejoin; -- -- Test hints given on incorrect column references are useful -- diff --git a/src/test/regress/expected/sysviews.out b/src/test/regress/expected/sysviews.out index 4e775af175..c734d5eca7 100644 --- a/src/test/regress/expected/sysviews.out +++ b/src/test/regress/expected/sysviews.out @@ -129,10 +129,11 @@ select name, setting from pg_settings where name like 'enable%'; enable_partition_pruning | on enable_partitionwise_aggregate | off enable_partitionwise_join | off + enable_self_join_removal | on enable_seqscan | on enable_sort | on enable_tidscan | on -(21 rows) +(22 rows) -- Test that the pg_timezone_names and pg_timezone_abbrevs views are -- more-or-less working. We can't test their contents in any great detail diff --git a/src/test/regress/sql/equivclass.sql b/src/test/regress/sql/equivclass.sql index 247b0a3105..77dd964ebf 100644 --- a/src/test/regress/sql/equivclass.sql +++ b/src/test/regress/sql/equivclass.sql @@ -259,6 +259,22 @@ drop user regress_user_ectest; explain (costs off) select * from tenk1 where unique1 = unique1 and unique2 = unique2; +-- Test that broken ECs are processed correctly during self join removal. +-- Disable merge joins so that we don't get an error about missing commutator. +-- Test both orientations of the join clause, because only one of them breaks +-- the EC. +set enable_mergejoin to off; + +explain (costs off) + select * from ec0 m join ec0 n on m.ff = n.ff + join ec1 p on m.ff + n.ff = p.f1; + +explain (costs off) + select * from ec0 m join ec0 n on m.ff = n.ff + join ec1 p on p.f1::int8 = (m.ff + n.ff)::int8alias1; + +reset enable_mergejoin; + -- this could be converted, but isn't at present explain (costs off) select * from tenk1 where unique1 = unique1 or unique2 = unique2; diff --git a/src/test/regress/sql/join.sql b/src/test/regress/sql/join.sql index 27e7e741a1..5d80af97dc 100644 --- a/src/test/regress/sql/join.sql +++ b/src/test/regress/sql/join.sql @@ -1793,6 +1793,335 @@ select * from select * from int8_tbl x join (int4_tbl x cross join int4_tbl y(ff)) j on q1 = f1; -- ok +-- +-- test that semi- or inner self-joins on a unique column are removed +-- + +-- enable only nestloop to get more predictable plans +set enable_hashjoin to off; +set enable_mergejoin to off; + +create table sj (a int unique, b int, c int unique); +insert into sj values (1, null, 2), (null, 2, null), (2, 1, 1); +analyze sj; + +-- Trivial self-join case. +explain (costs off) +select p.* from sj p, sj q where q.a = p.a and q.b = q.a - 1; +select p.* from sj p, sj q where q.a = p.a and q.b = q.a - 1; + +-- Self-join removal performs after a subquery pull-up process and could remove +-- such kind of self-join too. Check this option. +explain (costs off) +select * from sj p +where exists (select * from sj q + where q.a = p.a and q.b < 10); +select * from sj p where exists (select * from sj q where q.a = p.a and q.b < 10); + +-- Don't remove self-join for the case of equality of two different unique columns. +explain (costs off) +select * from sj t1, sj t2 where t1.a = t2.c and t1.b is not null; + +-- Degenerated case. +explain (costs off) +select * from + (select a as x from sj where false) as q1, + (select a as y from sj where false) as q2 +where q1.x = q2.y; + +-- We can't use a cross-EC generated self join qual because of current logic of +-- the generate_join_implied_equalities routine. +explain (costs off) +select * from sj t1, sj t2 where t1.a = t1.b and t1.b = t2.b and t2.b = t2.a; +explain (costs off) +select * from sj t1, sj t2, sj t3 +where t1.a = t1.b and t1.b = t2.b and t2.b = t2.a + and t1.b = t3.b and t3.b = t3.a; + +-- Double self-join removal. +-- Use a condition on "b + 1", not on "b", for the second join, so that +-- the equivalence class is different from the first one, and we can +-- test the non-ec code path. +explain (costs off) +select * from sj t1 join sj t2 on t1.a = t2.a and t1.b = t2.b + join sj t3 on t2.a = t3.a and t2.b + 1 = t3.b + 1; + +-- subselect that references the removed relation +explain (costs off) +select t1.a, (select a from sj where a = t2.a and a = t1.a) +from sj t1, sj t2 +where t1.a = t2.a; + +-- self-join under outer join +explain (costs off) +select * from sj x join sj y on x.a = y.a +left join int8_tbl z on x.a = z.q1; + +explain (costs off) +select * from sj x join sj y on x.a = y.a +left join int8_tbl z on y.a = z.q1; + +explain (costs off) +SELECT * FROM ( + SELECT t1.*, t2.a AS ax FROM sj t1 JOIN sj t2 + ON (t1.a = t2.a AND t1.c*t1.c = t2.c+2 AND t2.b IS NULL) +) AS q1 +LEFT JOIN + (SELECT t3.* FROM sj t3, sj t4 WHERE t3.c = t4.c) AS q2 +ON q1.ax = q2.a; + +-- Test that placeholders are updated correctly after join removal +explain (costs off) +select * from (values (1)) x +left join (select coalesce(y.q1, 1) from int8_tbl y + right join sj j1 inner join sj j2 on j1.a = j2.a + on true) z +on true; + +-- +-- SJR corner case: uniqueness of an inner is [partially] derived from +-- baserestrictinfo clauses. +-- XXX: We really should allow SJR for these corner cases? +-- + +INSERT INTO sj VALUES (3, 1, 3); + +explain (costs off) -- Don't remove SJ + SELECT * FROM sj j1, sj j2 WHERE j1.b = j2.b AND j1.a = 2 AND j2.a = 3; +SELECT * FROM sj j1, sj j2 +WHERE j1.b = j2.b AND j1.a = 2 AND j2.a = 3; -- Return one row + +explain (costs off) -- Remove SJ, define uniqueness by a constant + SELECT * FROM sj j1, sj j2 WHERE j1.b = j2.b AND j1.a = 2 AND j2.a = 2; +SELECT * FROM sj j1, sj j2 +WHERE j1.b = j2.b AND j1.a = 2 AND j2.a = 2; -- Return one row + +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM sj j1, sj j2 +WHERE j1.b = j2.b + AND j1.a = (EXTRACT(DOW FROM current_timestamp(0))/15 + 3)::int + AND (EXTRACT(DOW FROM current_timestamp(0))/15 + 3)::int = j2.a +; -- Remove SJ, define uniqueness by a constant expression +SELECT * FROM sj j1, sj j2 +WHERE j1.b = j2.b + AND j1.a = (EXTRACT(DOW FROM current_timestamp(0))/15 + 3)::int + AND (EXTRACT(DOW FROM current_timestamp(0))/15 + 3)::int = j2.a +; -- Return one row + +explain (costs off) -- Remove SJ + SELECT * FROM sj j1, sj j2 WHERE j1.b = j2.b AND j1.a = 1 AND j2.a = 1; +SELECT * FROM sj j1, sj j2 +WHERE j1.b = j2.b AND j1.a = 1 AND j2.a = 1; -- Return no rows + +explain (costs off) -- Shuffle a clause. Remove SJ + SELECT * FROM sj j1, sj j2 WHERE j1.b = j2.b AND 1 = j1.a AND j2.a = 1; +SELECT * FROM sj j1, sj j2 +WHERE j1.b = j2.b AND 1 = j1.a AND j2.a = 1; -- Return no rows + +-- Functional index +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX sj_fn_idx ON sj((a * a)); +explain (costs off) -- Remove SJ + SELECT * FROM sj j1, sj j2 + WHERE j1.b = j2.b AND j1.a*j1.a = 1 AND j2.a*j2.a = 1; +explain (costs off) -- Don't remove SJ + SELECT * FROM sj j1, sj j2 + WHERE j1.b = j2.b AND j1.a*j1.a = 1 AND j2.a*j2.a = 2; +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM sj j1, sj j2 +WHERE j1.b = j2.b + AND (j1.a*j1.a) = (EXTRACT(DOW FROM current_timestamp(0))/15 + 3)::int + AND (EXTRACT(DOW FROM current_timestamp(0))/15 + 3)::int = (j2.a*j2.a) +; -- Restriction contains expressions in both sides, Remove SJ. +SELECT * FROM sj j1, sj j2 +WHERE j1.b = j2.b + AND (j1.a*j1.a) = (EXTRACT(DOW FROM current_timestamp(0))/15 + 3)::int + AND (EXTRACT(DOW FROM current_timestamp(0))/15 + 3)::int = (j2.a*j2.a) +; -- Empty set of rows should be returned +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM sj j1, sj j2 +WHERE j1.b = j2.b + AND (j1.a*j1.a) = (random()/3 + 3)::int + AND (random()/3 + 3)::int = (j2.a*j2.a) +; -- Restriction contains volatile function - disable SJR feature. +SELECT * FROM sj j1, sj j2 +WHERE j1.b = j2.b + AND (j1.a*j1.c/3) = (random()/3 + 3)::int + AND (random()/3 + 3)::int = (j2.a*j2.c/3) +; -- Return one row + +-- Multiple filters +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX sj_temp_idx1 ON sj(a,b,c); +explain (costs off) -- Remove SJ + SELECT * FROM sj j1, sj j2 + WHERE j1.b = j2.b AND j1.a = 2 AND j1.c = 3 AND j2.a = 2 AND 3 = j2.c; +explain (costs off) -- Don't remove SJ + SELECT * FROM sj j1, sj j2 + WHERE j1.b = j2.b AND 2 = j1.a AND j1.c = 3 AND j2.a = 1 AND 3 = j2.c; + +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX sj_temp_idx ON sj(a,b); +explain (costs off) -- Don't remove SJ + SELECT * FROM sj j1, sj j2 WHERE j1.b = j2.b AND j1.a = 2; +explain (costs off) -- Don't remove SJ + SELECT * FROM sj j1, sj j2 WHERE j1.b = j2.b AND 2 = j2.a; +explain (costs off) -- Don't remove SJ + SELECT * FROM sj j1, sj j2 WHERE j1.b = j2.b AND (j1.a = 1 OR j2.a = 1); +DROP INDEX sj_fn_idx, sj_temp_idx1, sj_temp_idx; + +-- Test that OR predicated are updated correctly after join removal +CREATE TABLE tab_with_flag ( id INT PRIMARY KEY, is_flag SMALLINT); +CREATE INDEX idx_test_is_flag ON tab_with_flag (is_flag); +explain (costs off) +SELECT COUNT(*) FROM tab_with_flag +WHERE + (is_flag IS NULL OR is_flag = 0) + AND id IN (SELECT id FROM tab_with_flag WHERE id IN (2, 3)); +DROP TABLE tab_with_flag; + +-- HAVING clause +explain (costs off) +select p.b from sj p join sj q on p.a = q.a group by p.b having sum(p.a) = 1; + +-- update lateral references and range table entry reference +explain (verbose, costs off) +select 1 from (select x.* from sj x, sj y where x.a = y.a) q, + lateral generate_series(1, q.a) gs(i); + +explain (verbose, costs off) +select 1 from (select y.* from sj x, sj y where x.a = y.a) q, + lateral generate_series(1, q.a) gs(i); + +-- Test that a non-EC-derived join clause is processed correctly. Use an +-- outer join so that we can't form an EC. +explain (costs off) select * from sj p join sj q on p.a = q.a + left join sj r on p.a + q.a = r.a; + +-- FIXME this constant false filter doesn't look good. Should we merge +-- equivalence classes? +explain (costs off) +select * from sj p, sj q where p.a = q.a and p.b = 1 and q.b = 2; + +-- Check that attr_needed is updated correctly after self-join removal. In this +-- test, the join of j1 with j2 is removed. k1.b is required at either j1 or j2. +-- If this info is lost, join targetlist for (k1, k2) will not contain k1.b. +-- Use index scan for k1 so that we don't get 'b' from physical tlist used for +-- seqscan. Also disable reordering of joins because this test depends on a +-- particular join tree. +create table sk (a int, b int); +create index on sk(a); +set join_collapse_limit to 1; +set enable_seqscan to off; +explain (costs off) select 1 from + (sk k1 join sk k2 on k1.a = k2.a) + join (sj j1 join sj j2 on j1.a = j2.a) on j1.b = k1.b; +explain (costs off) select 1 from + (sk k1 join sk k2 on k1.a = k2.a) + join (sj j1 join sj j2 on j1.a = j2.a) on j2.b = k1.b; +reset join_collapse_limit; +reset enable_seqscan; + +-- Check that clauses from the join filter list is not lost on the self-join removal +CREATE TABLE emp1 ( id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY NOT NULL, code int); +explain (verbose, costs off) +SELECT * FROM emp1 e1, emp1 e2 WHERE e1.id = e2.id AND e2.code <> e1.code; + +-- We can remove the join even if we find the join can't duplicate rows and +-- the base quals of each side are different. In the following case we end up +-- moving quals over to s1 to make it so it can't match any rows. +create table sl(a int, b int, c int); +create unique index on sl(a, b); +vacuum analyze sl; + +-- Both sides are unique, but base quals are different +explain (costs off) +select * from sl t1, sl t2 where t1.a = t2.a and t1.b = 1 and t2.b = 2; + +-- Check NullTest in baserestrictinfo list +explain (costs off) +select * from sl t1, sl t2 +where t1.a = t2.a and t1.b = 1 and t2.b = 2 + and t1.c IS NOT NULL and t2.c IS NOT NULL + and t2.b IS NOT NULL and t1.b IS NOT NULL + and t1.a IS NOT NULL and t2.a IS NOT NULL; +explain (verbose, costs off) +select * from sl t1, sl t2 +where t1.b = t2.b and t2.a = 3 and t1.a = 3 + and t1.c IS NOT NULL and t2.c IS NOT NULL + and t2.b IS NOT NULL and t1.b IS NOT NULL + and t1.a IS NOT NULL and t2.a IS NOT NULL; + +-- Join qual isn't mergejoinable, but inner is unique. +explain (COSTS OFF) +SELECT n2.a FROM sj n1, sj n2 WHERE n1.a <> n2.a AND n2.a = 1; +explain (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM + (SELECT n2.a FROM sj n1, sj n2 WHERE n1.a <> n2.a) q0, sl +WHERE q0.a = 1; + +-- +---- Only one side is unqiue +--select * from sl t1, sl t2 where t1.a = t2.a and t1.b = 1; +--select * from sl t1, sl t2 where t1.a = t2.a and t2.b = 1; +-- +---- Several uniques indexes match, and we select a different one +---- for each side, so the join is not removed +--create table sm(a int unique, b int unique, c int unique); +--explain (costs off) +--select * from sm m, sm n where m.a = n.b and m.c = n.c; +--explain (costs off) +--select * from sm m, sm n where m.a = n.c and m.b = n.b; +--explain (costs off) +--select * from sm m, sm n where m.c = n.b and m.a = n.a; + +-- Check optimization disabling if it will violate special join conditions. +-- Two identical joined relations satisfies self join removal conditions but +-- stay in different special join infos. +CREATE TABLE sj_t1 (id serial, a int); +CREATE TABLE sj_t2 (id serial, a int); +CREATE TABLE sj_t3 (id serial, a int); +CREATE TABLE sj_t4 (id serial, a int); + +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON sj_t3 USING btree (a,id); +CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON sj_t2 USING btree (id); + +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) +SELECT * FROM sj_t1 +JOIN ( + SELECT sj_t2.id AS id FROM sj_t2 + WHERE EXISTS + ( + SELECT TRUE FROM sj_t3,sj_t4 WHERE sj_t3.a = 1 AND sj_t3.id = sj_t2.id + ) + ) t2t3t4 +ON sj_t1.id = t2t3t4.id +JOIN ( + SELECT sj_t2.id AS id FROM sj_t2 + WHERE EXISTS + ( + SELECT TRUE FROM sj_t3,sj_t4 WHERE sj_t3.a = 1 AND sj_t3.id = sj_t2.id + ) + ) _t2t3t4 +ON sj_t1.id = _t2t3t4.id; + +-- +-- Test RowMarks-related code +-- + +-- TODO: Why this select returns two coies of ctid field? Should we fix it? +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) -- Both sides have explicit LockRows marks +SELECT a1.a FROM sj a1,sj a2 WHERE (a1.a=a2.a) FOR UPDATE; + +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) -- A RowMark exists for the table being kept +UPDATE sj sq SET b = 1 FROM sj as sz WHERE sq.a = sz.a; + +CREATE RULE sj_del_rule AS ON DELETE TO sj + DO INSTEAD + UPDATE sj SET a = 1 WHERE a = old.a; +EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF) DELETE FROM sj; -- A RowMark exists for the table being dropped +DROP RULE sj_del_rule ON sj CASCADE; + +reset enable_hashjoin; +reset enable_mergejoin; + -- -- Test hints given on incorrect column references are useful -- diff --git a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list index a4a4e356e5..c60bb12451 100644 --- a/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list +++ b/src/tools/pgindent/typedefs.list @@ -362,6 +362,7 @@ CatalogId CatalogIdMapEntry CatalogIndexState ChangeVarNodes_context +ChangeVarnoContext CheckPoint CheckPointStmt CheckpointStatsData @@ -3768,6 +3769,7 @@ unicodeStyleColumnFormat unicodeStyleFormat unicodeStyleRowFormat unicode_linestyle +UniqueRelInfo unit_conversion unlogged_relation_entry utf_local_conversion_func -- 2.37.2