From: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Shinya11(dot)Kato(at)nttdata(dot)com, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: psql - factor out echo code |
Date: | 2021-07-14 07:57:54 |
Message-ID: | alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2107140905320.1705285@pseudo |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>> Attached v4 simplifies the format and fixes this one.
>
> I think this goes way way overboard in terms of invasiveness. There's no
> need to identify individual call sites of PSQLexec. [...]
ISTM that having the information was useful for the user who actually
asked for psql to show hidden queries, and pretty simple to get, although
somehow invasive.
> It also looks like a mess from the translatibility standpoint.
> You can't expect "%s QUERY" to be a useful thing for translators.
Sure. Maybe I should have used an enum have a explicit switch in
echoQuery, but I do not like writing this kind of code.
Attached a v5 without hinting at the origin of the query beyond internal
or not.
--
Fabien.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
psql-echo-5.patch | text/x-diff | 9.5 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2021-07-14 08:14:32 | Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side |
Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2021-07-14 07:52:41 | Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers, take 2 |