From: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: extend pgbench expressions with functions |
Date: | 2016-02-13 15:37:00 |
Message-ID: | alpine.DEB.2.10.1602131616210.3721@sto |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> But variables can still only be integers.
Version 28 attached has double variables, although typing is based on
guessing because it is just a string.
Any comment?
> [...] two separate enhancements in here. One of them is to support a
> new data type (doubles) and the other is to support functions.
The two features are highly intermix, so it can only be dependent patches,
first to add a function infrastructure and probably some support for
doubles altough it would not be used, then to add doubles & their
functions.
A real pain is the documentation, because it means writing a documentation
with only integer functions, then overwriting it with doubles. This is
dumb work, really, for the sake of "a cleaner git history", the beauty of
it no one will ever contemplate...
--
Fabien.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
pgbench-funcs-28.patch | text/x-diff | 41.6 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Christian Ullrich | 2016-02-13 15:45:33 | Re: Crash with old Windows on new CPU |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2016-02-13 15:28:54 | Re: pg_basebackup vs WAL fetching |