| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
|---|---|
| To: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Improving the latch handling between logical replication launcher and worker processes. |
| Date: | 2024-09-04 13:53:11 |
| Message-ID: | a319ee41-b17e-4d68-bbda-765ca0c066a7@iki.fi |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 04/09/2024 14:24, vignesh C wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Sept 2024 at 08:32, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I think this approach could solve the issue without adding
>> complexity. What do you think?
>
> I agree that this approach is more simple than the other approach. How
> about something like the attached patch to handle the same.
I haven't looked at these new patches from the last few days, but please
also note the work at
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/476672e7-62f1-4cab-a822-f3a8e949dd3f%40iki.fi.
If those "interrupts" patches are committed, this is pretty
straightforward to fix by using a separate interrupt bit for this, as
the patch on that thread does.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
Neon (https://neon.tech)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexandra Wang | 2024-09-04 14:15:06 | Re: Index AM API cleanup |
| Previous Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2024-09-04 13:25:03 | Re: Add parallel columns for seq scan and index scan on pg_stat_all_tables and _indexes |