Re: Remove dependence on integer wrapping

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Joseph Koshakow <koshy44(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Matthew Kim <matthewkmkim(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: Remove dependence on integer wrapping
Date: 2024-12-06 16:22:44
Message-ID: Z1Mk1FZ2beM9ee4q@nathan
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Dec 05, 2024 at 09:58:29PM -0600, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> Thanks for reviewing. In v28, I fixed a silly mistake revealed by cfbot's
> Windows run. I also went ahead and tried to fix most of the issues
> reported in a nearby thread [0]. The only one I haven't tracked down yet
> is the "ISO week" one (case 7).

The overflow hazard for the ISO week case seems to be in isoweek2j(), which
would require quite a bit of restructuring to work with the soft-error
handling from its callers. I'm not feeling particularly inspired to do
that, so here's a v29 with a comment added above that function.

--
nathan

Attachment Content-Type Size
v29-0001-Fix-various-overflow-hazards-in-date-and-timesta.patch text/plain 12.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shayon Mukherjee 2024-12-06 16:24:41 Re: Proposal to Enable/Disable Index using ALTER INDEX (with patch)
Previous Message jian he 2024-12-06 16:01:53 Re: refactor AlterDomainAddConstraint (alter domain add constraint)