From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Statistics Import and Export |
Date: | 2024-11-27 19:09:17 |
Message-ID: | Z0duXXLQQe85h-Vp@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 01:15:45PM -0500, Corey Huinker wrote:
>
> For people that want to use the old behavior of recomputing _all_
> statistics not just the missing ones, we could add a different switch,
> or an (optional) option to --analyze-in-stages.
>
> The current patchset provides that in the form of the parameter
> "--force-analyze", which is a modifier to "--analyze-in-stages" and
> "--analyze-only".
I don't think there is consensus to change --analyze-only, only maybe
--analyze-in-stages.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
When a patient asks the doctor, "Am I going to die?", he means
"Am I going to die soon?"
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dmitry Dolgov | 2024-11-27 19:51:38 | Re: [PoC] Reducing planning time when tables have many partitions |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2024-11-27 18:39:40 | Re: CREATE SCHEMA ... CREATE DOMAIN support |