Re: [PATCH] PGSERVICEFILE as part of a normal connection string

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Ryo Kanbayashi <kanbayashi(dot)dev(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Torsten Förtsch <tfoertsch123(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PGSERVICEFILE as part of a normal connection string
Date: 2025-03-28 01:44:04
Message-ID: Z-X-5PuSn98H6eJl@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 06:31:14PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> With all that in mind and more documentation added to the test, I've
> applied 0001, so let's see what the buildfarm has to say. The CI was
> stable, so it's a start.

The buildfarm (particularly the Windows members that worried me), have
reported back and I am not seeing any failures, so we should be good
with 72c2f36d5727.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii.Yuki@df.MitsubishiElectric.co.jp 2025-03-28 02:00:44 RE: Partial aggregates pushdown
Previous Message Rafael Thofehrn Castro 2025-03-28 01:37:56 Re: Proposal: Progressive explain