From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Refactor backup related code (was: Is it correct to say, "invalid data in file \"%s\"", BACKUP_LABEL_FILE in do_pg_backup_stop?) |
Date: | 2022-09-26 02:43:08 |
Message-ID: | YzERvNPaZivHEKZJ@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 09:12:22PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> I've read this one, and nothing is standing out at quick glance, so
> that looks rather reasonable to me. I should be able to spend more
> time on that at the beginning of next week, and maybe apply it.
What I had at hand seemed fine on a second look, so applied after
tweaking a couple of comments. One thing that I have been wondering
after-the-fact is whether it would be cleaner to return the contents
of the backup history file or backup_label as a char rather than a
StringInfo? This simplifies a bit what the callers of
build_backup_content() need to do.
--
Michael
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
xlogbackup-simpler.patch | text/x-diff | 4.4 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | wangw.fnst@fujitsu.com | 2022-09-26 03:09:55 | RE: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply |
Previous Message | osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com | 2022-09-26 02:31:11 | RE: Data is copied twice when specifying both child and parent table in publication |