Re: Preventing indirection for IndexPageGetOpaque for known-size page special areas

From: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
To: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Preventing indirection for IndexPageGetOpaque for known-size page special areas
Date: 2022-04-01 05:38:51
Message-ID: YkaP64JvZTMgcHtq@paquier.xyz
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 12:09:35PM +0200, Matthias van de Meent wrote:
> PageInit MAXALIGNs the size of the special area that it receives as an
> argument; so any changes to the page header that would misalign the
> value would be AM-specific; in which case it is quite unlikely that
> this is the right accessor for your page's special area.

Right. I'd still be tempted to keep that per-AM rather than making
the checks deeper with one extra macro layer in the page header or
with a different macro that would depend on the opaque type, though.
Like in the attached, for example.
--
Michael

Attachment Content-Type Size
opaque-macros.patch text/x-diff 3.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2022-04-01 05:41:26 Re: logical decoding and replication of sequences
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2022-04-01 05:34:33 Re: [HACKERS] WIP aPatch: Pgbench Serialization and deadlock errors