From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> |
Cc: | Jacob Champion <pchampion(at)vmware(dot)com>, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, buschmann(at)nidsa(dot)net, andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net, noah(at)leadboat(dot)com, tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, bruce(at)momjian(dot)us, andres(at)anarazel(dot)de |
Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade test for binary compatibility of core data types |
Date: | 2021-12-01 07:19:44 |
Message-ID: | YaciEMkHNumImMpk@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 03:58:18PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> + ver >= 905 AND ver <= 1300 AS oldpgversion_95_13,
> + ver >= 906 AND ver <= 1300 AS oldpgversion_96_13,
> + ver >= 906 AND ver <= 1000 AS oldpgversion_96_10,
> So here, we have the choice between conditions that play with version
> ranges or we could make those checks simpler but compensate with a set
> of IF EXISTS queries. I think that your choice is right. The
> buildfarm mixes both styles to compensate with the cases where the
> objects are created after a drop.
So, I have come back to this part of the patch set, that moves the SQL
queries doing the pre-upgrade cleanups in the old version we upgrade
from, and decided to go with what looks like the simplest approach,
relying on some IFEs depending on the object types if they don't
exist for some cases.
While checking the whole thing, I have noticed that some of the
operations were not really necessary. The result is rather clean now,
with a linear organization of the version logic, so as it is a
no-brainer to get that done in back-branches per the
backward-compatibility argument.
I'll get that done down to 10 to maximize its influence, then I'll
move on with the buildfarm code and send a patch to plug this and
reduce the dependencies between core and the buildfarm code.
--
Michael
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0001-Move-SQLs-for-cleanups-before-cross-version-upgrades.patch | text/x-diff | 6.2 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | PG Bug reporting form | 2021-12-01 13:59:30 | BUG #17305: to_timestamp accept dates rejected by timestamptz cast |
Previous Message | PG Bug reporting form | 2021-11-30 14:09:15 | BUG #17304: Test failure with -fsanitize=undefined |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-12-01 07:30:30 | Re: fix a typo in slotfuncs.c |
Previous Message | SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM | 2021-12-01 07:08:21 | Re: pg_replslotdata - a tool for displaying replication slot information |