From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
Subject: | Re: Refactoring HMAC in the core code |
Date: | 2021-01-23 04:43:20 |
Message-ID: | YAupaDtux0mykWtR@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 04:11:53PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Please find attached a rebased version. I have simplified the
> implementation to use an opaque pointer similar to the cryptohash
> part, leading to a large cleanup of the allocation logic for both
> implementations, with and without OpenSSL.
Rebased patch is attached wiht SHA1 added as of a8ed6bb. Now that
SHA1 is part of the set of options for cryptohashes, a lot of code of
pgcrypto can be cleaned up thanks to the refactoring done here, but
I am leaving that as a separate item to address later.
--
Michael
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v4-0001-Refactor-HMAC-implementations.patch | text/x-diff | 37.1 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dilip Kumar | 2021-01-23 04:47:13 | Re: Is Recovery actually paused? |
Previous Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2021-01-23 04:40:26 | Re: [PATCH] postgres_fdw connection caching - cause remote sessions linger till the local session exit |