From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bdrouvot(at)amazon(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Generating code for query jumbling through gen_node_support.pl |
Date: | 2023-02-05 10:40:57 |
Message-ID: | Y9+HuYslMAP6yyPb@paquier.xyz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 03:40:56PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> With all that in mind, I have spent my day polishing that and doing a
> close lookup, and the patch has been applied. Thanks a lot!
While working on a different patch, I have noticed a small issue in
the way the jumbling happens for A_Const, where ValUnion was not
getting jumbled correctly. This caused a few statements that rely on
this node to compile the same query IDs when using different values.
The full contents of pg_stat_statements for a regression database
point to:
- SET.
- COPY with queries.
- CREATE TABLE with partition bounds and default expressions.
This was causing some confusion in pg_stat_statements where some
utility queries would be incorrectly reported, and at this point the
intention is to keep this area compatible with the string-based method
when it comes to the values. Like read, write and copy nodes, we need
to compile the query ID based on the type of the value, which cannot
be automated. Attached is a patch to fix this issue with some
regression tests, that I'd like to get fixed before moving on with
more business in pg_stat_statements (aka properly show Const nodes for
utilities with normalized queries).
Comments or objections are welcome, of course.
(FWIW, I'd like to think that there is an argument to normalize the
A_Const nodes for a portion of the DDL queries, by ignoring their
values in the query jumbling and mark a location, which would be
really useful for some workloads, but that's a separate discussion I
am keeping for later.)
--
Michael
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
jumble-aconst.patch | text/x-diff | 4.9 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Aleksander Alekseev | 2023-02-05 10:41:17 | Re: [PATCH] Compression dictionaries for JSONB |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2023-02-05 09:22:05 | Re: what's the meaning of key? |