| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: allowing for control over SET ROLE |
| Date: | 2022-11-19 06:00:15 |
| Message-ID: | Y3hw7yvG0VwpC1jq@paquier.xyz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 18, 2022 at 04:19:15PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> Fixed that, and the other mistake Álvaro spotted, and also bumped
> catversion because I forgot that earlier.
I was looking at this code yesterday, to see today that psql's
completion should be completed with this new clause, similary to ADMIN
and INHERIT.
--
Michael
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| pgsql-set-clause.patch | text/x-diff | 2.7 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John Naylor | 2022-11-19 06:05:30 | Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum |
| Previous Message | Erik Rijkers | 2022-11-19 05:28:11 | Re: allowing for control over SET ROLE |