From: | "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | RE: Added missing invalidations for all tables publication |
Date: | 2021-09-08 02:27:09 |
Message-ID: | OS3PR01MB5718D92596A0289DC6908A0594D49@OS3PR01MB5718.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> From Mon, Sep 6, 2021 1:56 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 8:54 PM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > Thanks for the comments, the attached v3 patch has the changes for
> > > the same.
> > >
> >
> > I think this bug should be fixed in back branches (till v10). OTOH, as
> > this is not reported by any user and we have found it during code
> > review so it seems either users don't have an exact use case or they
> > haven't noticed this yet. What do you people think about back-patching?
>
> Personally, I think it's ok to back-patch.
I found that the patch cannot be applied to back-branches(v10-v14) cleanly,
so, I generate the patches for back-branches. Attached, all the patches have
passed regression test.
Best regards,
Hou zj
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v5-HEAD-0001-Invalidate-relcache-for-publications-defined-for-.patch | application/octet-stream | 5.9 KB |
v5-PG10-0001-Invalidate-relcache-for-publications-defined-for-.patch | application/octet-stream | 4.2 KB |
v5-PG11-0001-Invalidate-relcache-for-publications-defined-for-.patch | application/octet-stream | 4.2 KB |
v5-PG12-0001-Invalidate-relcache-for-publications-defined-for-.patch | application/octet-stream | 4.3 KB |
v5-PG13-0001-Invalidate-relcache-for-publications-defined-for-.patch | application/octet-stream | 4.3 KB |
v5-PG14-0001-Invalidate-relcache-for-publications-defined-for-.patch | application/octet-stream | 5.8 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-09-08 03:50:08 | Re: Estimating HugePages Requirements? |
Previous Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2021-09-08 02:17:36 | Re: Improve logging when using Huge Pages |