From: | "Nagaura, Ryohei" <nagaura(dot)ryohei(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Jamison, Kirk" <k(dot)jamison(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, 'Robert Haas' <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, "MikalaiKeida(at)ibagroup(dot)eu" <MikalaiKeida(at)ibagroup(dot)eu>, "AYahorau(at)ibagroup(dot)eu" <AYahorau(at)ibagroup(dot)eu>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | RE: Timeout parameters |
Date: | 2019-03-26 05:34:32 |
Message-ID: | EDA4195584F5064680D8130B1CA91C4540E0D3@G01JPEXMBYT04 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, kirk-san.
> From: Jamison, Kirk
> Ok. So I'd only take a look at TCP_USER_TIMEOUT parameter for now (this
> CommitFest), and maybe we could resume the discussion on socket_timeout
> in the future.
Yes, please.
> Your patch applies, however in TCP_backend_v10 patch, your documentation
> is missing a closing tag </varlistentry> so it could not be tested.
> When that's fixed, it passes the make check.
Oops! Fixed.
> what's the reason to emphasize Windows not supported in a separate
> paragraph?
I thought that it needs to be warned because there are some windows users.
But I came upon the idea that there are no need even it.
Thus the former doc you suggested seems better and I minor fixed doc to yours.
> (Note: I haven't checked which Linux versions are supported, I got it
> from your previous patch version.)
FYI, [1]
[1] http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man7/tcp.7.html
Best regards,
---------------------
Ryohei Nagaura
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
socket_timeout_v9.patch | application/octet-stream | 5.2 KB |
TCP_backend_v11.patch | application/octet-stream | 5.4 KB |
TCP_interface_v11.patch | application/octet-stream | 4.5 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2019-03-26 05:40:22 | Re: [HACKERS] proposal: schema variables |
Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2019-03-26 04:19:25 | Re: Refactoring the checkpointer's fsync request queue |