From: | "Shinoda, Noriyoshi (PN Japan FSIP)" <noriyoshi(dot)shinoda(at)hpe(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
Cc: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, "wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | RE: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply |
Date: | 2023-01-09 09:32:01 |
Message-ID: | DM4PR84MB173460530245F56364E1DAF7EEFE9@DM4PR84MB1734.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, Thanks for the great new feature.
Applied patches include adding wait events LogicalParallelApplyMain, LogicalParallelApplyStateChange.
However, it seems that monitoring.sgml only contains descriptions for pg_locks. The attached patch adds relevant wait event information.
Please update if you have a better description.
Noriyoshi Shinoda
-----Original Message-----
From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Sent: Monday, January 9, 2023 5:51 PM
To: houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>; wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com; Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>; shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com; PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>; Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply
On Sun, Jan 8, 2023 at 11:32 AM houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Sunday, January 8, 2023 11:59 AM houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> > Attach the updated patch set.
>
> Sorry, the commit message of 0001 was accidentally deleted, just
> attach the same patch set again with commit message.
>
Pushed the first (0001) patch.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
monitoring_wait_event_v1.diff | application/octet-stream | 967 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Aleksander Alekseev | 2023-01-09 09:56:12 | Re: POC: Lock updated tuples in tuple_update() and tuple_delete() |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2023-01-09 09:23:32 | Re: Privileges on PUBLICATION |