From: | talk to ben <blo(dot)talkto(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: archive modules |
Date: | 2022-08-24 08:05:55 |
Message-ID: | CAPE8EZ7vh6gdgHjAYhuvjUJzvZm7PGeZQaDDBfSYmDmfa+QeFg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On one hand, it seems like folks will commonly encounter this behavior
with this
> module, so this feels like a natural place for such a note.
Yes, I looked there first.
Would this addition to the pg_settings description be better ?
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0001-basic_archive-parameter-visibility-doc-patch.patch | text/x-patch | 1.4 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2022-08-24 08:40:07 | Re: standby promotion can create unreadable WAL |
Previous Message | Erik Rijkers | 2022-08-24 08:04:45 | Re: Schema variables - new implementation for Postgres 15 |