Re: archive modules

From: talk to ben <blo(dot)talkto(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Subject: Re: archive modules
Date: 2022-08-23 14:18:52
Message-ID: CAPE8EZ6yhCZjMTRR2Jp=mMCEuO9YnpmUWYMTuOzo7zaJuqwq8A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Would this addition to the documentation be ok ? I hope the english is not
too broken ..

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-basic_archive-parameter-visibility-doc-patch.patch text/x-patch 2.4 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2022-08-23 14:30:30 Re: making relfilenodes 56 bits
Previous Message Robert Haas 2022-08-23 13:58:47 Re: Letter case of "admin option"