| From: | Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> |
| Cc: | Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Wolfgang Walther <walther(at)technowledgy(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER |
| Date: | 2025-04-11 00:12:46 |
| Message-ID: | CAOYmi+nQRtnvFCdjRx+rA=MS1XTB8JTzj0q2o+zitzw=DSCYWg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 4:42 PM Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> wrote:
> I think your suggestion of not using any .so files would best there (from w user perspective). I'd be quite surprised if a static build still resulted in me having to manage shared library files anyway.
Done this way in v5. I had planned to separate the implementations by
a #define, but I ran into issues with Makefile.shlib, so I split the
shared and dynamic versions into separate files. I just now realized
that we do something about this exact problem in src/common, so I'll
see if I can copy its technique for the next go round.
In the next version, I'll try to add --with-oauth-client while keeping
--with-libcurl as an alias, to let the buildfarm migrate off of it
before it's removed.
Thanks!
--Jacob
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v5-0001-WIP-split-Device-Authorization-flow-into-dlopen-d.patch | application/octet-stream | 43.1 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sami Imseih | 2025-04-11 00:38:05 | Re: n_ins_since_vacuum stats for aborted transactions |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2025-04-11 00:08:22 | Re: Fundamental scheduling bug in parallel restore of partitioned tables |