| From: | Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: WIP Incremental JSON Parser |
| Date: | 2024-04-08 18:24:32 |
| Message-ID: | CAOYmi+=kx14ui_A__4L_XcFePSuUuR1kwJfUKxphuZU_i6=WpA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael pointed out over at [1] that the new tiny.json is pretty
inscrutable given its size, and I have to agree. Attached is a patch
to pare it down 98% or so. I think people wanting to run the
performance comparisons will need to come up with their own gigantic
files.
Michael, with your "Jacob might be a nefarious cabal of
state-sponsored hackers" hat on, is this observable enough, or do we
need to get it smaller? I was thinking we may want to replace the URLs
with stuff that doesn't link randomly around the Internet. Delicious
in its original form is long gone.
Thanks,
--Jacob
[1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ZhCTtpGoXbERacoN@paquier.xyz
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| shrink-tiny.patch.gz | application/x-gzip | 110.5 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jacob Champion | 2024-04-08 18:34:39 | Re: Security lessons from liblzma |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2024-04-08 18:15:20 | Re: PostgreSQL 17 Release Management Team & Feature Freeze |