From: | Anthonin Bonnefoy <anthonin(dot)bonnefoy(at)datadoghq(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Fix parallel vacuum buffer usage reporting |
Date: | 2024-03-28 10:12:40 |
Message-ID: | CAO6_Xqpt9t4Oyn9TBS9HeOupfuaH1B4xU9SYbs7k86cVK6m92w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
Thanks for the review.
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 4:07 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> As for the proposed patch, the following part should handle the temp
> tables too:
>
True, I've missed the local blocks. I've updated the patch:
- read_rate and write_rate now include local block usage
- I've added a specific output for reporting local blocks instead of
combining them in the same output.
Regards,
Anthonin
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v2-0001-Fix-parallel-vacuum-buffer-usage-reporting.patch | application/octet-stream | 10.1 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2024-03-28 10:33:00 | Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Add non-blocking version of PQcancel |
Previous Message | Bertrand Drouvot | 2024-03-28 10:04:21 | Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby |