| From: | Michail Nikolaev <michail(dot)nikolaev(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
| Subject: | Re: bt_index_parent_check and concurrently build indexes |
| Date: | 2024-12-10 12:17:37 |
| Message-ID: | CANtu0oi96HuXwQerAv1wgzNVGL57S7Cxj+Z=Hg0KPN6fgmjUOw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello, everyone and Peter.
I simplified the patch to reproduce the issue more effectively. Now,
bt_index_parent_check fails on a valid index containing just two tuples.
Peter, I included you in this message because you are the author of
bt_index_parent_check, so I thought you might find this relevant.
Best regards,
Mikhail.
>
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v2-0001-test-to-reproduce-issue-with-bt_index_parent_chec.patch | text/x-patch | 2.8 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Guillaume Lelarge | 2024-12-10 12:22:38 | Re: Proposals for EXPLAIN: rename ANALYZE to EXECUTE and extend VERBOSE |
| Previous Message | PG Doc comments form | 2024-12-10 11:57:07 | clarify which fields are signed int and which ones are unsigned |