Re: long-standing data loss bug in initial sync of logical replication

From: Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nitin Motiani <nitinmotiani(at)google(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: long-standing data loss bug in initial sync of logical replication
Date: 2024-12-11 03:43:32
Message-ID: CANhcyEW8y5nsRppOxmQOxu_4ibHYYHCE4XqpKrjJP6nk5sr5CQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 8 Oct 2024 at 11:11, Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi Kuroda-san,
>
> > > I have also modified the tests in 0001 patch. These changes are only
> > > related to syntax of writing tests.
> >
> > LGTM. I found small improvements, please find the attached.
>
> I have applied the changes and updated the patch.
>
Patches needed a rebase. Attached the rebased patch.

Thanks and Regards,
Shlok Kyal

Attachment Content-Type Size
v15-0001-Distribute-invalidatons-if-change-in-catalog-tab.patch application/octet-stream 13.8 KB
v15-0002-Selective-Invalidation-of-Cache.patch application/octet-stream 8.5 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message vignesh C 2024-12-11 04:27:38 Memory leak in pg_logical_slot_{get,peek}_changes
Previous Message Nisha Moond 2024-12-11 03:42:04 Re: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication