From: | Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Code checks for App Devs, using new options for transaction behavior |
Date: | 2022-11-22 16:02:40 |
Message-ID: | CANbhV-HprVyHjmCFDBHg0C3BTRW0YP8te7dZpT0z3B05vBzwHw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 7 Nov 2022 at 14:25, Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2 Nov 2022 at 07:40, Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > > What will be the behavior if someone declares a savepoint with this
> > > name ("_internal_nested_xact"). Will this interfere with this new
> > > functionality?
> >
> > Clearly! I guess you are saying we should disallow them.
> >
> > > Have we tested scenarios like that?
> >
> > No, but that can be done.
>
> More tests as requested, plus minor code rework, plus comment updates.
New versions
--
Simon Riggs http://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
001_psql_parse_only.v1.patch | application/octet-stream | 2.1 KB |
002_nested_xacts.v11.patch | application/octet-stream | 28.7 KB |
003_rollback_on_commit.v2.patch | application/octet-stream | 5.3 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | walther | 2022-11-22 16:04:58 | Re: fixing CREATEROLE |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2022-11-22 15:57:41 | Re: ssl tests aren't concurrency safe due to get_free_port() |