From: | Richard Guo <riguo(at)pivotal(dot)io> |
---|---|
To: | Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: A problem about partitionwise join |
Date: | 2020-01-19 04:01:16 |
Message-ID: | CAN_9JTxsSsEcZqLnsZNU8dXXLY+_wRNB_6sKToU068KS_VNqbA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Rebased the patch with latest master and also addressed the test case
failure reported by PostgreSQL Patch Tester.
Thanks
Richard
On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 11:35 AM Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 12:08 PM Richard Guo <riguo(at)pivotal(dot)io> wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 11:03 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
> wrote:
> >> On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 08:35:33PM +0900, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> >> > I've just started reviewing this patch. One comment I have for now
> >> > is: this is categorized into Bug Fixes, but we have a workaround at
> >> > least to the regression test case in the patch (ie, just reorder join
> >> > clauses), so this seems to me more like an improvement than a bug fix.
> >>
> >> Hmm. Agreed. Changed the category and moved to next CF.
>
> > thanks Michael for the change.
>
> +1
>
> Best regards,
> Etsuro Fujita
>
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v2-0001-Fix-up-partitionwise-join.patch | application/octet-stream | 9.7 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2020-01-19 08:09:56 | Re: range_agg |
Previous Message | Noah Misch | 2020-01-19 03:51:39 | Re: [HACKERS] WAL logging problem in 9.4.3? |