Re: SQL/JSON json_table plan clause

Hi Amit!

No, JSON_TABLE is ok. I've meant that in the previous approach to PLAN
clause
implementation there were some wrong tests.

On Tue, Feb 4, 2025 at 6:05 AM Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Hi Nikita,
>
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 12:11 AM Nikita Malakhov <hukutoc(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi hackers!
> >
> > This thread is further work continued in [1], where Amit Langote
> > suggested starting discussion on the remaining SQL/JSON feature
> > 'PLAN clause for JSON_TABLE' anew.
> >
> > We'd like to help with merging SQL/JSON patches into vanilla,
> > and have adapted PLAN clause to recent changes in JSON_TABLE
> > function.
>
> Thanks for working on this.
>
> > While doing this we've found that some tests with the PLAN clause
> > were incorrect, along with JSON_TABLE behavior with this clause.
> > We've corrected this behavior, but these corrections required reverting
> > some removed and heavily refactored code, so we'd be glad for review
> > and feedback on this patch.
>
> Sorry, I don't fully understand this paragraph. Do you mean that
> there might be bugs in the existing JSON_TABLE() functionality that
> was committed into v17?
>
> --
> Thanks, Amit Langote
>

--
Regards,
Nikita Malakhov
Postgres Professional
The Russian Postgres Company
https://postgrespro.ru/