| From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Oleksii Kliukin <alexk(at)hintbits(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: WIP: Failover Slots |
| Date: | 2016-03-17 08:34:27 |
| Message-ID: | CAMsr+YE6LNy2e0tBuAQB+NTVb6W-dHJAfLq0-zbAL7G7hjhXBA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
OK, here's the latest failover slots patch, rebased on top of today's
master plus, in order:
- Dirty replication slots when confirm_lsn is changed
(
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAMsr+YHJ0OyCUG2zbyQpRHxMcjnkt9D57mSxDZgWBKcvx3+r-w@mail.gmail.com
)
- logical decoding timeline following
(
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAMsr+YH-C1-X_+s=2nzAPnR0wwqJa-rUmVHSYyZaNSn93MUBMQ@mail.gmail.com
)
The full tree is at
https://github.com/2ndQuadrant/postgres/tree/dev/failover-slots if you want
to avoid the fiddling around required to apply the patch series.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 0001-Allow-replication-slots-to-follow-failover.patch | text/x-patch | 48.0 KB |
| 0002-Update-decoding_failover-tests-for-failover-slots.patch | text/x-patch | 3.2 KB |
| 0003-Retain-extra-WAL-for-failover-slots-in-base-backups.patch | text/x-patch | 3.6 KB |
| 0004-Add-the-UI-and-for-failover-slots.patch | text/x-patch | 11.7 KB |
| 0005-Document-failover-slots.patch | text/x-patch | 8.4 KB |
| 0006-Add-failover-to-pg_replication_slots.patch | text/x-patch | 9.6 KB |
| 0007-Introduce-TAP-recovery-tests-for-failover-slots.patch | text/x-patch | 25.4 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dean Rasheed | 2016-03-17 08:49:18 | Re: Re: Add generate_series(date,date) and generate_series(date,date,integer) |
| Previous Message | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI | 2016-03-17 08:18:51 | Re: PATCH: index-only scans with partial indexes |