From: | Will Mortensen <will(at)extrahop(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Marco Slot <marco(dot)slot(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, marco(at)citusdata(dot)com, Yvonne Chen <yvonne(at)extrahop(dot)com>, Jacob Speidel <jacob(at)extrahop(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Exposing the lock manager's WaitForLockers() to SQL |
Date: | 2024-01-29 04:06:03 |
Message-ID: | CAMpnoC5yryhhaYO=tJbqRO4LdrbHGWgLJ6iLDK8udCOdKce7RQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I guess the output of the deadlock test was unstable, so I simply
removed it in v8 here, but I can try to fix it instead if it seems
important to test that.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v8-0001-Refactor-GetLockConflicts-into-more-general-GetLo.patch | application/octet-stream | 10.6 KB |
v8-0003-Add-pg_wait_for_lockers-function.patch | application/octet-stream | 29.4 KB |
v8-0002-Allow-specifying-single-lockmode-in-WaitForLocker.patch | application/octet-stream | 8.2 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | vignesh C | 2024-01-29 04:40:16 | Re: Documentation to upgrade logical replication cluster |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2024-01-29 04:05:44 | Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby |