From: | Nitin Jadhav <nitinjadhavpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Inconsistency in reporting checkpointer stats |
Date: | 2022-12-15 10:13:35 |
Message-ID: | CAMm1aWZoD2YoCNQkqVpiT8kSrMcM6d6J0pHb8JuKqd8sU9w3Lw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> /* If part of a checkpoint, count this as a buffer written. */
> if (fdata)
> CheckpointStats.ckpt_bufs_written++;
> + PendingCheckpointerStats.buf_written_checkpoints++;
> Also, the proposed patch would touch PendingCheckpointerStats even
> when there is no fdata, aka outside the context of a checkpoint or
> shutdown sequence.
Sorry. I missed adding braces. Fixed in the v2 patch attached.
Thanks & Regards,
Nitin Jadhav
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 3:16 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 04:54:53PM +0530, Bharath Rupireddy wrote:
> > Indeed PendingCheckpointerStats.buf_written_checkpoints needs to count
> > buffer writes in SlruInternalWritePage(). However, does it need to be
> > done immediately there? The stats will not be visible to the users
> > until the next pgstat_report_checkpointer(). Incrementing
> > buf_written_checkpoints in BufferSync() makes sense as the
> > pgstat_report_checkpointer() gets called in there via
> > CheckpointWriteDelay() and it becomes visible to the user immediately.
> > Have you checked if pgstat_report_checkpointer() gets called while the
> > checkpoint calls SlruInternalWritePage()? If not, then you can just
> > assign ckpt_bufs_written to buf_written_checkpoints in
> > LogCheckpointEnd() like its other friends
> > checkpoint_write_time and checkpoint_sync_time.
>
> /* If part of a checkpoint, count this as a buffer written. */
> if (fdata)
> CheckpointStats.ckpt_bufs_written++;
> + PendingCheckpointerStats.buf_written_checkpoints++;
> Also, the proposed patch would touch PendingCheckpointerStats even
> when there is no fdata, aka outside the context of a checkpoint or
> shutdown sequence..
> --
> Michael
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v2-0001-Fix-inconsistency-in-checkpointer-stats.patch | application/octet-stream | 1011 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Drouvot, Bertrand | 2022-12-15 10:20:18 | Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys |
Previous Message | Nitin Jadhav | 2022-12-15 10:12:00 | Re: Inconsistency in reporting checkpointer stats |