Re: Fix obsoleted comments for function prototypes

From: Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fix obsoleted comments for function prototypes
Date: 2022-08-04 11:02:13
Message-ID: CAMbWs4-=Zf-ehuF=ZOz7XfC-+-ZdEj-cwx0duyAqKfDXDjEOmg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 4:38 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:

> On Tue, Aug 02, 2022 at 07:25:49PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > These declarations are linked to comments with their file paths, so
> > making that automated looks rather complicated to me. I have looked
> > at the surroundings without noticing anything obvious, so what you
> > have caught here sounds fine to me, good catches :)
>
> Done as of 245e14e.

Thank you Michael!

Thanks
Richard

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dilip Kumar 2022-08-04 11:08:35 Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Previous Message David Steele 2022-08-04 10:32:38 Re: Race between KeepFileRestoredFromArchive() and restartpoint