From: | Shubham Barai <shubhambaraiss(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Borodin <amborodin86(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | GSoC 2017: weekly progress reports (week 8) |
Date: | 2017-07-26 15:20:52 |
Message-ID: | CALxAEPtdyzk3Q67CMdxEhheNz8XM9BVm5uGoMzJ=uViXZrZUmw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Project: Explicitly support predicate locks in index AMs besides b-tree
Hi,
During this week, I worked on predicate locking in spgist index. I think,
for spgist index, predicate lock only on leaf pages will be enough as
spgist searches can determine if there is a match or not only at leaf level.
I have done following things in this week.
1) read the source code of spgist index to understand the access method
2) found appropriate places to insert calls to existing functions
3) created tests (to verify serialization failures and to demonstrate the
feature of reduced false positives) for 'point' and 'box' data types.
link to code and tests: https://github.com/shub
hambaraiss/postgres/commit/d9ae709c93ff038478ada411c621faeabe6813cb
I will attach the patch shortly.
Regards,
Shubham
<https://mailtrack.io/> Sent with Mailtrack
<https://mailtrack.io/install?source=signature&lang=en&referral=shubhambaraiss(at)gmail(dot)com&idSignature=22>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-07-26 15:29:16 | Re: AlterUserStmt anmd RoleSpec rules in grammar.y |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-07-26 15:12:53 | Re: Testlib.pm vs msys |