Re: Printing backtrace of postgres processes

From: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, torikoshia(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Printing backtrace of postgres processes
Date: 2023-11-04 20:19:00
Message-ID: CALj2ACW34HuRUvS3bR_cEKgmueQVkOPzU8h8xBpOS9EMqajQ5w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 8:22 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
>
> > On 11 Jan 2023, at 15:44, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 11:43 AM Bharath Rupireddy
> > <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >>
> >> I'm attaching the v22 patch set for further review.
> >
> > Needed a rebase due to 216a784829c2c5f03ab0c43e009126cbb819e9b2.
> > Attaching v23 patch set for further review.
>
> This thread has stalled for well over 6 months with the patch going from CF to
> CF. From skimming the thread it seems that a lot of the details have been
> ironed out with most (all?) objections addressed. Is any committer interested
> in picking this up? If not we should probably mark it returned with feedback.

Rebase needed due to function oid clash. Picked the new OID with the
help of src/include/catalog/unused_oids. PSA v24 patch set.

--
Bharath Rupireddy
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
v24-0001-Move-sending-multiplexed-SIGUSR1-signal-code-to-.patch application/x-patch 5.6 KB
v24-0002-Add-function-to-log-the-backtrace-of-specified-p.patch application/x-patch 24.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2023-11-04 20:57:48 Re: Inconsistent use of "volatile" when accessing shared memory?
Previous Message Andrey M. Borodin 2023-11-04 20:07:52 Re: SLRU optimization - configurable buffer pool and partitioning the SLRU lock