From: | Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
Cc: | Alexander Kukushkin <cyberdemn(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: WARNING: missing lock on database "postgres" (OID 5) @ TID (0,4) |
Date: | 2024-12-17 05:00:10 |
Message-ID: | CALdSSPjcUZ8XG4Vk5A+dGGYGi5WCfcPyzowYXiQ5Lk_BhzGOcg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 at 04:43, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
> The reason I said databases.sql for the test is that CREATE DATABASE is
> expensive. We currently have just one successful CREATE DATABASE in the
> src/test/regress suite, and we shouldn't add more that reasonably could
> instead harness the existing one. Would you do it that way?
Sure, my bad, I missed this part of your message. PFA v5 with
database.sql changes.
--
Best regards,
Kirill Reshke
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v5-0001-When-making-dependency-changes-lock-the-tuple-for.patch | application/octet-stream | 5.6 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bertrand Drouvot | 2024-12-17 05:15:06 | Re: Track the amount of time waiting due to cost_delay |
Previous Message | Sami Imseih | 2024-12-17 04:47:05 | Re: improve EXPLAIN for wide tables |