Re: WARNING: missing lock on database "postgres" (OID 5) @ TID (0,4)

From: Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Alexander Kukushkin <cyberdemn(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WARNING: missing lock on database "postgres" (OID 5) @ TID (0,4)
Date: 2024-12-11 06:37:49
Message-ID: CALdSSPhZyqsDaEYZD-QtWLX5yA1m05TjeeMYV663B106iwgJQA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 10 Dec 2024 at 14:14, Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> CI fails due to bad naming in the regression test.
> The change is deptestdb1 -> regressdeptestdb1

I'm very sorry for spam.

PFAv4

regressdeptestdb1 -> regressiondeptestdb1

--
Best regards,
Kirill Reshke

Attachment Content-Type Size
v4-0001-When-making-dependency-changes-lock-the-tuple-for.patch application/octet-stream 6.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Naylor 2024-12-11 06:39:12 Re: Sort functions with specialized comparators
Previous Message Nohez Poonawala 2024-12-11 06:37:34 Suggestion to standardize comment format in pg_dump