From: | Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Finnerty, Jim" <jfinnert(at)amazon(dot)com> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Maxim Orlov <orlovmg(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Add 64-bit XIDs into PostgreSQL 15 |
Date: | 2022-01-14 19:38:46 |
Message-ID: | CALT9ZEEr8vuSpvjFQgyLJrn1+ha4yP-_4WZiGea2SvyEG6_FTg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
>
> We intend to do the following work on the patch soon:
> 1. Write a detailed README
> 2. Split the patch into several pieces including a separate part for
> XID_FMT. But if committers meanwhile choose to commit Jim's XID_FMT patch
> we also appreciate this and will rebase our patch accordingly.
> 2A. Probably refactor it to store precalculated XMIN/XMAX in memory
> tuple representation instead of t_xid_base/t_multi_base
> 2B. Split the in-memory part of a patch as a separate
> 3. Construct some variants for leaving "double xmax" format as a temporary
> one just after upgrade for having only one persistent on-disk format
> instead of two.
> 3A. By using SQL function "vacuum doublexmax;"
> OR
> 3B. By freeing space on all heap pages for pd_special before
> pg-upgrade.
> OR
> 3C. By automatically repacking all "double xmax" pages after upgrade
> (with a priority specified by common vacuum-related GUCs)
> 4. Intentionally prohibit starting a new transaction with XID difference
> of more than 2^32 from the oldest currently running one. This is to enforce
> some dba's action for cleaning defunct transaction but not binding one:
> he/she can wait if they consider these old transactions not defunct.
> 5. Investigate and add a solution for archs without 64-bit atomic values.
> 5A. Provide XID 8-byte alignment for systems where 64-bit atomics
> is provided for 8-byte aligned values.
> 5B. Wrap XID reading into PG atomic locks for remaining 32-bit ones
> (they are expected to be rare).
>
Hi, hackers!
PFA patch with README for 64xid proposal. It is 0003 patch of the same v6,
that was proposed earlier [1].
As always, I very much appreciate your ideas on this readme patch, on
overall 64xid patch [1], and on the roadmap on its improvement quoted above.
--
Best regards,
Pavel Borisov
Postgres Professional: http://postgrespro.com <http://www.postgrespro.com>
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v6-0003-README-for-64bit-xid.patch | application/octet-stream | 6.4 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bossart, Nathan | 2022-01-14 19:42:29 | Re: Add sub-transaction overflow status in pg_stat_activity |
Previous Message | James Coleman | 2022-01-14 19:24:50 | Re: Parallelize correlated subqueries that execute within each worker |