Re: Support logical replication of DDLs

On Wed, 17 May 2023 at 15:41, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 12:03 PM shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 4:23 PM shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 4:31 PM shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 3:58 PM shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 8:30 AM shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 5:11 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Now, I think we can try to eliminate this entire ObjTree machinery and
> > > > > > > directly from the JSON blob during deparsing. We have previously also
> > > > > > > discussed this in an email chain at [1]. I think now the functionality
> > > > > > > of JSONB has also been improved and we should investigate whether it
> > > > > > > is feasible to directly use JSONB APIs to form the required blob.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +1.
> > > > > > I will investigate this and will share my findings.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Please find the PoC patch for create-table after object-tree removal.
> > > >
> > >
> >
> > Please find the new set of patches attached for object-tree removal.
>
> Please find the new set of patches for object-tree Removal. The new
> changes are in patch 0008 only. The new changes incorporate the
> object-tree removal for 'alter table' command.

The patch was not applying on top of HEAD because of a recent commit
"psql: Adjust capitalization of table heading", attached a rebased
version.

Regards,
Vignesh