From: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Handle infinite recursion in logical replication setup |
Date: | 2022-09-02 10:29:01 |
Message-ID: | CALDaNm3fwW4mHGfpZfVLaHe_tSavOSPqntD5XPwO+_jwScrj_g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 29 Aug 2022 at 16:35, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 7:27 PM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Since there was no objections to change it to throw a warning, I have
> > made the changes for the same.
> >
>
> Review comments for v42-0001*
> ==========================
> 1. Can we improve the query in check_pub_table_subscribed() so that it
> doesn't fetch any table that is already part of the subscription on
> the subscriber? This may be better than what the patch is doing which
> is to first fetch such information and then skip it. If forming this
> query turns out to be too complex then we can retain your method as
> well but I feel it is worth trying to optimize the query used in the
> patch.
I have modified the query to skip the tables as part of the query. The
attached v45 patch has the changes for the same.
Regards,
Vignesh
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v45-0001-Check-and-log-a-warning-if-the-publisher-has-sub.patch | application/octet-stream | 22.0 KB |
v45-0002-Document-the-steps-for-replication-between-prima.patch | application/octet-stream | 20.9 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | vignesh C | 2022-09-02 10:33:44 | Re: Handle infinite recursion in logical replication setup |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2022-09-02 10:27:03 | Re: test_decoding assertion failure for the loss of top-sub transaction relationship |