Re: doc: Mention clock synchronization recommendation for hot_standby_feedback

From: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jakub Wartak <jakub(dot)wartak(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: doc: Mention clock synchronization recommendation for hot_standby_feedback
Date: 2025-03-14 10:31:13
Message-ID: CALDaNm2pwt8pA=6G3C=7TcF6iW5OYJKGzq4-tZmi_MtMkUNYew@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 5 Mar 2025 at 11:46, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 4:44 PM Jakub Wartak
>
> I can go with the last patch as you observed that in a real-world
> case, and we can look at others (if any) on a case-to-case basis.
> Fujii-San, others, do you have any opinion on this?

+1 for this approach.

Regards,
Vignesh

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2025-03-14 11:16:42 Re: Optimization for lower(), upper(), casefold() functions.
Previous Message vignesh C 2025-03-14 10:22:42 Re: [PATCH] Fixed creation of empty .log files during log rotation