From: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication |
Date: | 2023-11-19 01:26:05 |
Message-ID: | CALDaNm0LCQg0n9NT6TvfVE05gNroPwMbtj=BKZUi2_wAWo4EvQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, 19 Nov 2023 at 06:52, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 10 Nov 2023 at 19:26, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 9 Nov 2023 at 12:23, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> > >
> >
> > > Note: actually, this would be OK if we are able to keep the OIDs of
> > > the subscribers consistent across upgrades? I'm OK to not do nothing
> > > about that in this patch, to keep it simpler. Just asking in passing.
> >
> > I will analyze more on this and post the analysis in the subsequent mail.
>
> I analyzed further and felt that retaining subscription oid would be
> cleaner as subscription/subscription_rel/replication_origin/replication_origin_status
> all of these will be using the same oid as earlier and also probably
> help in supporting upgrade of subscription in more scenarios later.
> Here is a patch to handle the same.
Sorry I had attached the older patch, here is the correct updated one.
Regards,
Vignesh
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v1-0001-Retain-the-subscription-oids-during-upgrade.patch | text/x-patch | 4.8 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2023-11-19 02:18:30 | Re: long-standing data loss bug in initial sync of logical replication |
Previous Message | vignesh C | 2023-11-19 01:22:09 | Re: pg_upgrade and logical replication |