hi
Some errors are related to just CORRESPONDING without any columns. So using
> expr doesn't help here. So parse node CORRESPONDING can solve both issues.
>
>
In current implementation pointing to a node means pointing to a node’s
first element so I don’t think we can be able to point to CORRESPONDING
without any columns
I find out that there is already a node prepare for the case called A_Const.
The attached patch use that node
Regards
Surafel