From: | Surafel Temesgen <surafel3000(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ryan Lambert <ryan(at)rustprooflabs(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Rémi Lapeyre <remi(dot)lapeyre(at)lenstra(dot)fr>, Eli Marmor <eli(at)netmask(dot)it>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Georgios <gkokolatos(at)protonmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: WIP: System Versioned Temporal Table |
Date: | 2021-01-26 16:39:18 |
Message-ID: | CALAY4q-4YpPc=hSGpxCJBVwpTKzm2A5JyoXUr+2Lh0KTiUcjPQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 2:33 PM Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org> wrote:
> I'm still in the weeds of reviewing this patch, but why should this
> fail? It should not fail.
>
Attached is rebased patch that include isolation test
regards
Surafel
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
system-versioning-temporal-table_2021_v13.patch | text/x-patch | 144.6 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Laurenz Albe | 2021-01-26 17:20:41 | Re: Error on failed COMMIT |
Previous Message | Surafel Temesgen | 2021-01-26 16:29:11 | Re: FETCH FIRST clause PERCENT option |